Background: Both standard and immune-enhancing oral formulas are widely used to forestall HIV wasting and to promote immune function. However, there is little scientific evidence to support the differential effects of these formulas in asymptomatic HIV disease. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of an immune-enhancing oral formula and a standard oral formula on nutrition and immune measures in asymptomatic HIV-infected persons. A secondary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of maintaining a diverse sample of outpatients on a long-term oral formula protocol.
Methods: In this multicenter controlled nonblinded study, 90 asymptomatic HIV-infected persons with CD4 cell counts between 275 and 550 cells/mm3 were randomized to a control group; a standard oral formula group (Ensure Plus); or an immune-enhancing oral formula group (Advera). All groups received basic nutrition counseling. Participants were evaluated on nutrition, immune, and feasibility measures at 3-month intervals during the 12-month study period. Differences in nutrition and immune measures among the 3 groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. Wilcoxon tests and correlation coefficients were used to analyze feasibility data.
Results: Sixty-six outpatients completed the 12-month study protocol. Among the 3 groups, there were no significant differences with respect to body weight, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived body cell and fat mass, daily caloric intake, and serum albumin at any of the study visits. Moreover, absolute CD4+ T lymphocytes and percentages did not significantly differ at any time point among the 3 groups. Acceptability and tolerance of the formulas were high for both the standard and immune-enhancing oral formula groups.
Conclusions: Within the context and limitations of this study, standard and immune-enhancing oral formulas consumed daily for 1 year had no differential effects on nutrition or immune parameters in asymptomatic HIV-infected persons.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014860710202600106 | DOI Listing |
J Ethnopharmacol
January 2025
College of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, China; Gansu Key Laboratory of Animal Generational Physiology and Reproductive Regulation, Lanzhou, 730070, Gansu, China. Electronic address:
Ethnopharmacological Relevance: Lonicerae japonicae flos (LJF), the dried flower bud or newly bloomed flower of Lonicera japonica Thunb., is widely used in Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), exhibiting anti-inflammatory and immune-enhancing properties. Luteolin (Lut) is a major bioactive component of LJF, demonstrating a regulatory role in immune disorders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
September 2024
INVIVO Co. Ltd., 121, Deahak-ro, Nonsan, Chungnam, 32992, Republic of Korea.
Cheonggukjang () is a traditional food, made by the fermentation of beans, and it has different recipes for different regions in Korea. However, it has anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-obesity effects, and is known to affect changes in the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we investigated the immune-enhancing effects of four type s (one commercial and three transitional s).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Microbiol Biotechnol
October 2024
Biotech Research Institute, Grape King Bio Ltd, Taoyuan City 325, Taiwan.
In response to the growing demand for immune-related products, this study evaluated the safety and immune-modulating potential of three newly discovered strains (GKM3, GKK1, and GKD7) through toxicity tests and whole-genome sequencing. Safety evaluations, including the analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors, plasmids, and prophages, classified these strains as safe for human consumption. Acute oral toxicity tests further supported their safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
July 2024
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
April 2024
Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: Poor preoperative nutritional status has been consistently linked to an increase in postoperative complications and worse surgical outcomes. We updated a review first published in 2012.
Objectives: To assess the effects of preoperative nutritional therapy compared to usual care in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!