Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Only patients, which respond to neoadjuvant therapy and in which a subsequent complete resection (R0) is possible, demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to non-responders. Therefore, a sensitive response evaluation is of high clinical interest. Response evaluation by endoscopy, biopsy, endoluminal ultrasound or by CT scan showed unfavourable and overall nor reliable results. In recent studies, a accurate response prediction employing 18FDG-PET seems to be possible. Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation of esophageal cancer, a sensitive differentiation between responders and non-responders was possible in a retrospective study. In the beginning are investigations, to differentiate already after two weeks of therapy between both groups of patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!