A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (Montelukast) in the treatment of asthma crisis: preliminary results of a double-blind placebo controlled randomized study. | LitMetric

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy of oral Montelukast 10 mg as an add-on therapy to the usual emergency therapy of an asthma crisis in an emergency room (ER).

Population: Twenty adults that sought medical attention in the ER of our Hospital and in whom, on admission, it appeared unnecessary to give systemic steroids.

Methods: All patients received the usual therapy of the asthma crisis. Simultaneously it was randomly administered a capsule containing 10 mg Montelukast or placebo, in a double-blind protocol. In both groups we evaluated the evolution of Peak-Flow values, the duration of stay in the ER as well as the need for additional therapy with systemic aminophylline or steroids, representing an insufficient response to the initial treatment. Student's T test was used to evaluate the statistical differences between these two groups.

Results: Both the Montelukast (MK) and Placebo (PL) groups were comparable regarding age and sex distribution, Peak-Flow values and Arterial O2 values on admission. During therapy, MK group had a shorter duration of ER stay (MK = 2.5 h; PL = 2.9 h) and a better evolution of Peak-Flow values (medium increase of 55% from baseline versus 44% in PL group). However these differences did not reach statistical significance. In the MK group one patient needed systemic steroids and 4 received systemic aminophylline while in the PL group 4 patients received systemic steroids and 8 aminophylline. This difference was significant (p = 0.03). We did not observe any significant side effects during therapy.

Conclusions: Despite a small trend favourable to Montelukast we did not observe significant differences between groups regarding duration of stay or Peak-Flow evolution during therapy in ER, most probably due to the small sample size. However patients in the MK group needed significantly less systemic therapy with aminophylline or steroids. These data, in view of the very good safety profile of Montelukast, allow us to conclude that this is a useful additional therapy, which should be considered in the ER treatment of the asthma crisis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asthma crisis
16
peak-flow values
12
duration stay
12
treatment asthma
8
therapy
8
therapy asthma
8
patients received
8
montelukast placebo
8
evolution peak-flow
8
additional therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!