Many common pharmacological treatments have effects on cognitive ability. Psychometric task batteries used to characterize such effects do not provide direct information about treatment-related changes in brain function. Since overt task performance reflects motivation and effort as well as ability, behavioral measures alone may overestimate or underestimate the impact of a pharmacological intervention on brain function. Here we present a method that combines behavioral and neurophysiological measures in an attempt to detect the psychoactive effects of pharmacological treatments with greater sensitivity than that provided by behavioral measures alone. Initial application of the method is made to the data from a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in which caffeine, diphenhydramine, and alcohol were used to alter the mental state of 16 healthy subjects at rest and while they performed low load and high load versions of a working memory task. For each intervention, more sensitive detection of drug or alcohol effects over a four hour period was obtained when EEG variables were included in multivariate analyses than when only behavioral variables were used. These initial results suggest that it can be useful to incorporate neurophysiological measures of brain activity into inferences concerning the acute impact of drugs on mental function, and demonstrate the feasibility of using multivariate combinations of behavioral and neurophysiological measures to sensitively characterize the pharmacodynamics of drug-induced changes in cognition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00300-1 | DOI Listing |
Gastroenterol Clin North Am
March 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre for Pancreatic Diseases & Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibroinflammatory disease, with pain as its most prominent symptom. This article provides a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, assessment methodologies, and management strategies pertaining to pain in CP. Pathophysiological mechanisms include inflammatory and neuropathic components, including peripheral and central sensitization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAging Cell
January 2025
Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit, Transcription and Disease Laboratory, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.
SYNGAP1 is a Ras GTPase-activating protein that plays a crucial role during brain development and in synaptic plasticity. Sporadic heterozygous mutations in SYNGAP1 affect social and emotional behaviour observed in intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although neurophysiological deficits have been extensively studied, the epigenetic landscape of SYNGAP1 mutation-mediated intellectual disability is unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOpen Access J Sports Med
January 2025
Brainnet, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Metro Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Introduction: Athletic peak performance is increasingly focused on cognitive and mental factors. In the current study, cognitive performance was measured by neurophysiological responses in elite Junior-A hockey players.
Methods: Neurophysiological brain vital signs were extracted from event-related potentials (ERPs) to evaluate auditory sensation (the N100), basic attention (the P300), and cognitive processing (the N400).
Am J Psychiatry
January 2025
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) and Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), University of Montreal, Montreal (Couture, Desbeaumes Jodoin, Bousseau, Sarshoghi, Miron, Lespérance); IfADo Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors at TU Dortmund, Germany, and Bielefeld University, University Hospital OWL, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, and German Center for Mental Health (Nitsche); Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention and Campbell Family Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto (Blumberger); Department of Medicine (Bolduc) and Department of Psychiatry and Addictology (Lespérance, Miron), Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal; Interventional Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego (Weissman, Appelbaum, Daskalakis, Poorganji, Miron).
Objective: This study investigated spaced transcranial direct current stimulation for major depressive disorder, focusing on feasibility.
Methods: In a prospective open-label study, 30 participants with major depressive disorder were enrolled to receive a 50-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatment over 2 weeks. The feasibility, safety, tolerability, and preliminary therapeutic effects of this tDCS protocol were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 1-week and 4-week follow-ups, as well as with the 6-item HAM-D (HAM-D-6) daily during treatment.
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery and Department of Neuroscience, Fujian Key Laboratory of Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Precision Treatment, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Brain Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Purpose: To investigate the technique for dorsal median sulcus (DMS) mapping and assess its application value in preserving dorsal columnn (DC) function during intramedullary space occupying surgery based on a single-center experience.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 cases of intramedullary spinal cord tumor admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from March 2017 to August 2023. All included cases underwent intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, and were divided into a study group (n = 18) and a control group (n = 23), based on whether DMS mapping technique was utilized.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!