A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical usefulness of the common carotid artery blood flow velocity ratio as measured by an ultrasonic quantitative flow measurement system: evaluation with respect to prevalence of ischemic heart disease. | LitMetric

The present study evaluated the clinical usefulness of the measurement of common carotid artery blood flow velocity by an ultrasonic quantitative flow measurement system (QFM), and its correlation with the prevalence of ischemic heart disease (IHD). The subjects in this study included 287 patients (149 men and 138 women; mean age, 67.6+/-11.0 years) being treated as outpatients. Bilateral common carotid artery blood flow velocity was measured using a QFM-1100 (Hayashi Denki Co., Ltd.). The "high to low velocity ratio" (H/L ratio) was calculated by dividing the higher value by the lower value of the velocity of the common carotid artery. In 43 of 287 patients, we used an SSA-270 ACE (Toshiba Co., Ltd) to determine the presence of plaque and measure intimal-medial thickness (IMT) in the common carotid arteries. The mean H/L ratio was 1.45, with a median value of 1.25. The patients were stratified into subgroups based on H/L ratios from 1.0 and above in 0.1 increments in order to compare the prevalence rates of IHD. The prevalence rates in groups with H/L ratios of 1.3 and greater were significantly higher than those in the group with H/L ratios less than 1.3. In logistic regression analysis, the unadjusted H/L ratio was an independent risk factor for IHD at ratios from greater than 1.1 to greater than 1.6. The age-adjusted H/L ratio was an independent risk factor for IHD at ratios from greater than 1.1 to greater than 1.4. IMT was significantly higher in patients with a H/L ratio of 1.4 or greater versus patients with a ratio less than 1.4 (1.154+/-0.417 mm vs. 0.421+/-0.425 mm; p<0.05). The prevalence of carotid artery plaque was also significantly higher in patients with a H/L ratio of 1.4 or greater versus patients with a ratio of less than 1.4 (76.5% vs. 38.5%; p<0.03). Therefore, determination of the carotid artery H/L ratio by means of QFM may be clinically useful in screening patients for coronary artery lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1272/jnms.68.482DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

common carotid
20
h/l ratio
20
carotid artery
16
artery blood
12
blood flow
12
flow velocity
12
h/l ratios
12
ratios greater
12
ultrasonic quantitative
8
quantitative flow
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!