Background: Alcohol interventions decrease alcohol consumption and recurrent injury. The study hypotheses are (1) intoxicated passengers are similar to intoxicated drivers in crashes and driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), and (2) DUI conviction rates after injury are low.
Methods: Intoxicated motor vehicle occupants hospitalized for injury in 1996-1998 were matched to the state traffic database for crashes and DUI. Drivers and passengers were compared for crashes and DUI in the 2 years preceding and 1 year after admission. Driver DUI citation at the time of admission was also recorded. A logistic regression model for crash and DUI probability was constructed.
Results: Six hundred seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. In the 2 years preceding admission, passengers and drivers were equally cited for crashes (14.7% vs 19.3%, p = 0.12). In 1 year after admission, they were also equally cited (7.1% vs 7.7%, p = 0.92). Driver/passenger status was not a predictor by logistic regression; 13.4% of intoxicated drivers were convicted of DUI for the admitting crash.
Conclusion: Intoxicated passengers and drivers are equally likely to be cited for crashes and DUI before and after admission for injury. Few admitted intoxicated drivers are convicted of DUI. Screening and intervention for all intoxicated crash occupants is warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200112000-00011 | DOI Listing |
Toxins (Basel)
October 2024
Department of Medicine, Division of Occupational, Environmental, and Climate Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Biol Psychiatry
September 2024
Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California. Electronic address:
Am J Prev Med
January 2025
NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, New York.
Introduction: Ignition interlock devices installed after conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) have been shown to reduce subsequent DUI arrests (specific deterrence). However, there is little evidence on how interlock-device penalties might affect general deterrence, that is, deterring people from driving after consuming alcohol prior to a DUI conviction.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted and data were analyzed in 2023 with 583 U.
Arch Toxicol
December 2024
Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Linköping, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Many people convicted for drunken driving suffer from an alcohol use disorder and some traffic offenders consume denatured alcohol for intoxication purposes. Venous blood samples from people arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol were analyzed in triplicate by headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) using three different stationary phases. The gas chromatograms from this analysis sometimes showed peaks with retention times corresponding to acetone, ethyl methyl ketone (2-butanone), 2-propanol, and 2-butanol in addition to ethanol and the internal standard (1-propanol).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTraffic Inj Prev
November 2024
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Objective: The prevalence of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs has become a prominent factor in the occurrence of severe road crashes worldwide. Driving often occurs after visiting, and presumably drinking, at Alcohol-Serving Establishments (ASEs), and is thus of interest as a possible source of DUI events.
Methods: We apply statistical and machine learning models to the Victorian Integrated Survey of Travel and Activity (VISTA) to identify factors that contribute to driving in trips from ASEs in Australia's state of Victoria.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!