AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

A 5-year review of a group of 13 patients with infected total knee replacements deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision is presented. The 'Beefburger' procedure was initially performed in all the patients as a 'definitive' procedure. Eight patients had no further procedure performed, three patients were deemed suitable for a subsequent arthrodesis, and two went on to above-knee amputation. Three patients died within the first 6 weeks, but infection was successfully eradicated in eight of the remaining 10 patients (80%) at the time of death or latest review. At follow-up, all traceable subjects had Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores and SF-36 scores of below average. No significant difference was found between the 'Beefburger' or arthrodesis groups. In conclusion, the 'Beefburger' procedure gives results similar to arthrodesis and amputation in patients deemed unsuitable for two-stage revision surgery and should perhaps be considered as an option in these medically compromised patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0968-0160(01)00104-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

'beefburger' procedure
12
unsuitable two-stage
12
two-stage revision
12
patients
9
procedure patients
8
infected total
8
total knee
8
deemed unsuitable
8
three patients
8
patients deemed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!