Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester's experience and the examination technique.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Oslo, Ulleval Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0407 Oslo, Norway.

Published: September 2001

Clinical knee examination is imperative for the prognosis, follow-up, and scientific comparison of anterior cruciate ligament surgery results. A new device, the Rolimeter knee tester was studied in this study with respect to inter- and intratester reliability. We found no significant difference in the intratester evaluation, and data were reliable between repeated measurements and between different testers with the same examination technique. The tester's experience seems to play a role using use the Rolimeter knee tester, but even an inexperienced tester can use it and obtain data that are very close to the data obtained by an experienced tester when the same technique is used. Furthermore, it was found that the manual examination of anterior translation also provides a reliable measurement, at least in the hand of experienced testers. Further advantages are that the Rolimeter knee tester is cheap, can be sterilized, and is simple to use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670100225DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rolimeter knee
16
knee tester
16
inter- intratester
8
tester's experience
8
examination technique
8
tester
6
knee
5
intratester comparison
4
rolimeter
4
comparison rolimeter
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The failure rate following posterolateral corner reconstruction (PLC) remains high. Previous research indicates that in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction the laxity is affected by the tibial slope (TS). However, there is currently no literature evaluating the impact of TS on surgical outcome in combined reconstruction of PLC/PCL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) has been advocated in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve knee stability and furthermore, decrease failure rates. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, knee laxity, and failure rates after revision ACLR with LET (ACLR + LET) versus without LET. It was hypothesized that ACLR + LET improves clinical outcomes and reduces the failure rate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Addressing grade 2 and 3 medial-sided instabilities during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is crucial to reduce the risk of ACL graft failure. This study introduced a minimally invasive, medial collateral ligament (MCL) augmentation technique using a peroneus longus split tendon autograft, which was fixed to the femoral deep MCL insertion and tibial superficial MCL insertion.

Methods: This prospective, longitudinal, single-centre case series included patients who underwent MCL augmentation concurrent with primary or revision ACL reconstruction due to anteromedial instability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of suture-tape augmented ACL repair (internal bracing) versus traditional ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in terms of knee laxity, proprioception, and neuromuscular control.
  • Researchers measured anterior tibial translation, joint position sense, and muscle activities in patients who underwent either procedure after ACL injury.
  • Results showed that both techniques produced similar outcomes for knee stability and sensory control, indicating that internal bracing may be a viable alternative to traditional ACL reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lateral meniscus root tear in anterior cruciate ligament injured patients is not associated with increased rotatory knee laxity: A quantitative pivot shift analysis.

J ISAKOS

December 2024

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates how tears in the lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) impact knee laxity in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, particularly focusing on differences in knee movement and stability.
  • Patients were divided into groups based on the presence or absence of LMPR tears and underwent various tests to measure knee stability, including a pivot shift test and assessment of anterior tibial translation.
  • Results showed that the group with LMPR tears had a higher prevalence of medial meniscus tears, but there were no significant differences in knee laxity measures between the LMPR+ and LMPR- groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!