Ligand Dehydrogenation in Ruthenium-Amine Complexes: Reactivity of 1,2-Ethanediamine and 1,1,1-Tris(aminomethyl)ethane.

Inorg Chem

Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, Laboratorium für Chemische und Mineralogische Kristallographie, Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland, and Ciba-Geigy AG, CH-1701 Fribourg, Switzerland.

Published: June 1997

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

The mechanisms of oxidative ligand dehydrogenation in high-valent ruthenium hexaamine complexes of bidentate 1,2-ethanediamine (en) and tridentate 1,1,1-tris(aminomethyl)ethane (tame) are elucidated in detail. In basic aqueous solution, [Ru(III)(tame)(2)](3+) undergoes rapid initial deprotonation (pK(III) = 10.3). This is followed by a pH-dependent disproportionation step involving either [Ru(III)(tame)(2)-H(+)](2+) + [Ru(III)(tame)(2)](3+) (k(1d) = 8300 M(-)(1) s(-)(1)) or two singly deprotonated [Ru(III)(tame)(2)-H(+)](2+) ions (k(2d) = 3900 M(-)(1) s(-)(1)). The products are [Ru(II)(tame)(2)](2+) and either the singly deprotonated species [Ru(IV)(tame)(2)-H(+)](3+) (pK(IV) = 8.2) or the doubly deprotonated [Ru(IV)(tame)(2)-2H(+)](2+). These Ru(IV) complexes undergo spontaneous dehydrogenation to give the imine [Ru(II)(imtame)(tame)](2+) (imtame = 1,1-bis(aminomethyl)-1-(iminomethyl)ethane), with first-order rate constants of k(1im) = 320 s(-)(1) and k(2im) = 1.1 s(-)(1), respectively. In the [Ru(III)(en)(3)](3+) system, the initial deprotonation (pK(III) = 10.4) is followed by the corresponding disproportionation reactions (k(1d) = 9000 M(-)(1) s(-)(1), k(2d) = 3800 M(-)(1) s(-)(1)). The complex [Ru(IV)(en)(3)-H(+)](3+) (pK(IV) = 8.9) and its deprotonated counterpart, [Ru(IV)(en)(3)-2H(+)](2+), undergo dehydrogenation to give [Ru(II)(imen)(en)(2)](2+) (imen = 2-aminoethanimine) with first-order rate constants of k(1im) = 600 s(-)(1) and k(2im) = 1.0 s(-)(1), respectively. In the light of this analysis, the disproportionation and ligand oxidation of the [Ru(III)(sar)](3+) ion are reexamined (k(1d) = 4 x 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1), k(2d) >/= 2 x 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1), pK(IV) = 2.0, k(1im) = 17 s(-)(1), k(2im) = 5 x 10(-)(4) s(-)(1) at 25 degrees C). While the disproportionation to Ru(II) and Ru(IV) has been recognized in such systems, the complexity of the paths has not been realized previously; the surprising variation in the rates of the intramolecular redox reaction (from days to milliseconds) is now dissected and understood. Other facets of the intramolecular redox reaction are also analyzed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic961021qDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

m-1 s-1
24
s-1
12
s-1 k2im
12
ligand dehydrogenation
8
initial deprotonation
8
deprotonation pkiii
8
singly deprotonated
8
first-order rate
8
rate constants
8
constants k1im
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!