Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Practitioners of medicine have a moral as well as legal obligation to serve their patients to the best of their ability, and in recent years the medical profession throughout the world has affirmed this principle. But where there is negligence of this sacred duty, a claim arises. Most civil claims are governed by the law of limitation, which restricts the time in which a plaintiff can bring a suit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Otol
October 2024
Law at China University of Geosciences (Beijing), No.29 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District,Beijing,100083, China.
Under the background of medical disputes growing in number, scale and intensity, tracing back legal changes in medical field as a breakthrough point, this paper took a legal perspective to illustrate changes in medical dispute settlements from legislative orientation to legal system improvement. In view of the fact that early legislation in medical field was biased towards identification and punishment of doctors' responsibility, and later intensive legislation in balancing increasing "medical trouble" phenomenon with limited effects and difficulties to abide by the law, this paper proposed to improve doctor-patient dispute settlements system in China referencing from foreign law experience, to reduce investigation of doctors at the judicial level, and to establish a settlement mechanism on doctors' apology at the legislative level, so as to promote a healthy development of doctor-patient relationship.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Forensic Odontostomatol
December 2024
Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto.
Health Hum Rights
December 2024
Associate professor in the Department of Health Promotion and Policy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, United States.
Front Sociol
December 2024
Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Legal decision-making aspires to be objective, a principle regarded as foundational to justice, public trust, and the legitimacy of legal outcomes. However, this ideal is often challenged by the reality of human judgment, which is influenced by subjective factors such as emotions, biases, and varying cognitive strategies. This paper investigates the psychological challenges faced by legal professionals in the context of sentencing, drawing on data from studies involving judges and prosecutors in Slovenia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!