Empowerment and care management: swimming against the tide.

Health Soc Care Community

School of Health and Social Sciences, Coventry University, UK.

Published: November 1998

This paper is concerned with the policy and practice of care management, that is, the system for assessing care needs and arranging services to meet them, developed under the legislative framework of National Health Service (NHS) and Community Care Act 1990. The paper takes as its starting point the contrast between the rhetoric of service user empowerment in professional training, particularly of social workers, with the disempowering realities that arise in practice. It examines some of the sources of this conflict, looking in particular at contradictions inherent within the development of care management as a policy, conflicts contained within the legislation and associated guidance and contradictions evident at the level of practice. It argues that organizational processes and procedures consequent upon care management as it is evolving in practice are decreasing the possibilities for empowering practice and reinforcing the power of care managers at the expense of service users. It suggests that the power of the care manager is based on increased administrative and managerial responsibility, counterbalanced by diminishing professional autonomy and discretion. Some possibilities for future development if empowerment is to survive as a meaningful concept within care management are outlined. The paper concludes that there are serious limitations on the scope for empowerment within care management and that the real hope for empowerment lies in the encouragement and support of user-led initiatives in service planning, evaluation and provision.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.1998.00135.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

care management
24
care
9
empowerment care
8
power care
8
management
6
empowerment
5
practice
5
management swimming
4
swimming tide
4
tide paper
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Lumbar fusion and lumbar disk replacement (LDR) are common surgical options for chronic low back pain, but this study focused on comparing their postoperative management costs over two years.
  • A total of 1,660 patients were studied, revealing that the average cost for postoperative care was approximately $2,832 per patient, with similar costs for both procedures.
  • The main cost driver was physical therapy, highlighting that while LDR may have a shorter recovery, it does not significantly reduce long-term healthcare expenses compared to lumbar fusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The neonatal mortality rate in Pakistan is the third highest in Asia, with 8.6 million preterm babies. These newborns require warmth, nutrition, and infection protection, typically provided by incubators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Mental health concerns have become increasingly prevalent; however, care remains inaccessible to many. While digital mental health interventions offer a promising solution, self-help and even coached apps have not fully addressed the challenge. There is now a growing interest in hybrid, or blended, care approaches that use apps as tools to augment, rather than to entirely guide, care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease primarily treated through molecular-targeted therapies. However, emerging evidence suggests that dietary interventions may also play a role in managing inflammation associated with this condition. The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet), prevalent in southern European countries, has been widely recognized for its ability to reduce cardiovascular mortality, largely due to its anti-inflammatory properties.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although substantial progress has been made in establishing evidence-based psychosocial clinical interventions and implementation strategies for mental health, translating research into practice-particularly in more accessible, community settings-has been slow.

Objective: This protocol outlines the renewal of the National Institute of Mental Health-funded University of Washington Advanced Laboratories for Accelerating the Reach and Impact of Treatments for Youth and Adults with Mental Illness Center, which draws from human-centered design (HCD) and implementation science to improve clinical interventions and implementation strategies. The Center's second round of funding (2023-2028) focuses on using the Discover, Design and Build, and Test (DDBT) framework to address 3 priority clinical intervention and implementation strategy mechanisms (ie, usability, engagement, and appropriateness), which we identified as challenges to implementation and scalability during the first iteration of the center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!