AI Article Synopsis

  • Automated microscopy has become reliable for routine use in clinical pathology, particularly in detecting tumor cells in breast cancer patients.
  • The MDS System outperformed manual microscopy with higher sensitivity for identifying rare tumor cells in bone marrow samples.
  • In a study, the automated system missed only 3.8% of cases compared to 38% missed by pathologists using manual methods, highlighting its superior reproducibility and precision.

Article Abstract

The use of automated microscopy has reached the maturity necessary for its routine use in the clinical pathology laboratory. In the following study we compared the performance of an automated microscope system (MDS) with manual method for the detection and analysis of disseminated tumor cells present in bone marrow preparations from breast carcinoma patients. The MDS System detected rare disseminated tumor cells among bone marrow mononuclear cells with higher sensitivity than standard manual microscopy. Automated microscopy also proved to be a method of high reproducibility and precision, the advantage of which was clearly illustrated by problems of variability in manual screening. Accumulated results from two pathologists who had screened 120 clinical slides from breast cancer patients both by manual microscopy and by use of the MDS System revealed only two (3.8%) missed by the automatic procedure, whereas as many as 20 out of 52 positive samples (38%) were missed by manual screening.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.1130DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

automated microscopy
12
disseminated tumor
12
tumor cells
12
cells bone
12
bone marrow
12
mds system
8
manual microscopy
8
manual screening
8
38% missed
8
manual
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!