A continuous infusion of vancomycin (CIV) may provide an alternative mode of infusion in severe hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant staphylococcal (MRS) infections. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study was designed to compare CIV (targeted plateau drug serum concentrations of 20 to 25 mg/liter) and intermittent infusions of vancomycin (IIV; targeted trough drug serum concentrations of 10 to 15 mg/liter) in 119 critically ill patients with MRS infections (bacteremic infections, 35%; pneumonia, 45%). Microbiological and clinical outcomes, safety, pharmacokinetics, ease of treatment adjustment, and cost were compared. Microbiological and clinical outcomes and safety were similar. CIV patients reached the targeted concentrations faster (36 +/- 31 versus 51 +/- 39 h, P = 0.029) and fewer samples were required for treatment monitoring than with IIV patients (7.7 +/- 2.2 versus 11.8 +/- 3.9 per treatment, P < 0.0001). The variability between patients in both the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC(24h)) and the daily dose given over 10 days of treatment was lower with CIV than with IIV (variances, 14,621 versus 53,975 mg(2)/liter(2)/h(2) [P = 0.026] and 414 versus 818 g(2) [P = 0.057], respectively). The 10-day treatment cost per patient was $454 +/- 137 in the IIV group and was 23% lower in the CIV group ($321 +/- 81: P < 0.0001). In summary, for comparable efficacy and tolerance, CIV may be a cost-effective alternative to IIV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC90678 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.9.2460-2467.2001 | DOI Listing |
Antibiotics (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Geriatrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
In hospital- and community-acquired central nervous system infections, resistant Gram-positive bacteria are an increasing therapeutic challenge. The present approach does not attempt to identify rapidly bactericidal therapies for susceptible pathogens but aims to improve methods to find antibiotic regimens for multi-resistant pathogens that are effective in vivo in spite of reduced in vitro susceptibility in culture media. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and Mueller-Hinton broth (, methicillin-resistant , ) or brain-heart infusion ().
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
Internal Medicine Department - Nephrology, Botucatu School of Medicine, University São Paulo State-UNESP, District of Rubiao Junior, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of vancomycin change during HD, increasing the risk of subtherapeutic concentrations. The aim of this study was to evaluate during and after the conventional and prolonged hemodialysis sessions to identify the possible risk of the patient remaining without adequate antimicrobial coverage during therapy. Randomized, non-blind clinical trial, including critically ill adults with septic AKI on conventional (4 h) and prolonged HD (6 and 10 h) and using vancomycin for at least 72 h.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Nephrology, CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital, Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA.
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction characterized by extensive skin rash in association with hematological abnormalities, including eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis, lymphadenopathy, fever, and extensive visceral organ involvement. Here, we presented a rare case of vancomycin-induced DRESS syndrome in a male who was treated with IV vancomycin for a brain abscess.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol
January 2025
INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Toulouse, France.
Vancomycin is an antibiotic used for severe infections. To ensure microbiological efficacy, a ratio of AUC/MIC ≥400 is recommended. However, there is significant interindividual variability in its pharmacokinetic parameters, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring to adjust dosing regimens and ensure efficacy while avoiding toxicity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImportance: Little is known about the safety of midline catheters vs peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).
Objective: To compare outcomes from midline catheters vs PICCs for OPAT.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients who received antimicrobial therapy through a midline catheter or PICC between January 2017 and November 2023 across 69 Michigan hospitals.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!