Purpose: To determine whether epidural lidocaine reduces the severity of propofol injection pain compared with iv lidocaine.

Methods: A prospective, randomized double-blind clinical study was conducted in 120 female patients scheduled for elective gynecological laparotomy. A lumbar epidural catheter and an iv catheter placed in the cephalic vein of the non-dominant hand were used in all patients. Patients of the control group (Group C) were given epidural normal saline followed by iv normal saline then iv propofol. Patients of Group E were given epidural 2% lidocaine (0.08 mL.cm(-1)) followed by iv normal saline and then propofol. Patients of Group V were given epidural normal saline followed by iv 2% lidocaine (0.05 mL.kg(-1)) then propofol. Pain was scored as no pain=0, minimal pain=1, moderate pain=2, severe pain=3.

Results: The pain scores, in group E; 1 (0-2) and group V; 2 (0-2), were significantly lower than in group C; 2 (1-3); median (25th-75th percentile) (P <0.001). There was no difference in pain score between groups E and V The plasma lidocaine concentration 15 min after epidural lidocaine was 2.74 +/- 0.54 microg.ml(-1), compared with 1.54 +/- 0.31 microg.mL(-1) at three minutes after iv lidocaine.

Conclusion: Epidural and iv lidocaine equally reduced the severity of propofol injection pain despite higher lidocaine plasma concentrations in epidurally administered lidocaine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03016829DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

normal saline
16
group epidural
12
lidocaine reduces
8
propofol injection
8
injection pain
8
epidural lidocaine
8
epidural normal
8
saline propofol
8
propofol patients
8
patients group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!