Health plans' use of asthma quality improvement projects to meet NCQA accreditation standards.

Am J Manag Care

Consumer Health Initiative, Advisory Board Company, Washington, DC, USA.

Published: June 2001

Background: Managed care represents an important system of healthcare delivery in the United States and the primary source of care for many persons with asthma.

Objective: To characterize how US managed care health plans address the quality of asthma care through the use of disease-specific quality improvement (QI) programs complying with National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) standards.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional review of reports from all accreditation surveys conducted in 1996 and 1997 by the NCQA. Each accreditation report was reviewed for evidence of whether the health plan explored asthma care as a way to demonstrate compliance with NCQA accreditation standards. Asthma activity was examined with respect to health plan characteristics such as size of plan and Medicaid contracting. Types of asthma QI activity, use of guidelines, and application of different NCQA accreditation standards were also examined.

Results: Approximately 90% of 197 health plans undergoing NCQA accreditation surveys in 1996 and 1997 reported some form of asthma QI activity. There were no statistically significant differences in this activity in large vs small plans or in plans with vs without Medicaid members. Approximately two thirds of health plans used asthma QI activities to meet NCQA accreditation standards in health management systems, and three fifths monitored and evaluated important aspects of asthma care and service.

Conclusions: During the study period, many US health plans conducted asthma care QI activities. The recently released NCQA asthma performance measure may provide the next assessment of how well managed care is contributing to improving asthma care in the United States.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ncqa accreditation
24
asthma care
20
accreditation standards
16
health plans
16
managed care
12
asthma activity
12
asthma
11
care
9
health
8
quality improvement
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: We examined differences in patient outcomes associated with 3 patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition programs-National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Level 3, The Joint Commission (TJC), and Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC)-among Medicare beneficiaries receiving care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Study Design: We used data from CMS' FQHC Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration, in which participating FQHCs received assistance to achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition. We assessed the impact of the 3 recognition programs on utilization, quality, and Medicare expenditures using a sample of 1108 demonstration and comparison FQHCs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) is the most widely used accrediting body of health plans, but no study has explored how differences in health quality affect the accreditation level. Consumers may benefit as they guide health insurance purchasing decisions toward a cost-quality evaluation. The authors conducted a multinomial logistic regression analysis using data from the 2015 NCQA Quality Compass of 351 health plans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The study objective was to better understand specific implementation gaps for various aspects of patient-centered medical home (PCMH) care delivered to seniors. The study illuminates the physician and staff experience by focusing on how individuals make sense of and respond behaviorally to aspects of PCMH implementation.

Method: Qualitative data from 51 in-depth, semi-structured interviews across six different National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-accredited primary care practices were collected and analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: The Pennsylvania Academy of Family Physicians (PAFP) developed a statewide Residency Program Collaborative (RPC) to facilitate family medicine residency practices in Pennsylvania becoming recognized patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs). This report outlines the methods and a brief evaluation of the RPC, which included 20 residency practices. Participants attended tri-annual learning sessions and monthly conference calls, received physician faculty mentorship, and reported clinical quality data monthly on diabetes and ischemic vascular disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Measuring quality in the early years of health insurance exchanges.

Am J Manag Care

January 2014

Quality Solutions Group, National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC 20005, USA.

Objectives: To identify quality measures that health plans can reliably report during the early years of health insurance exchanges and over time, and to suggest strategies to increase the availability of quality results to use in rating and monitoring plans.

Study Design: Projection of a set of measures available for public reporting based on prevalence and experience with health plans' reporting of the quality measures.

Methods: For the quality measures included in the federal Initial Core Set of Adult Health Care Quality Measures for Medicaid-Eligible Adults, we looked at the proportion of people in the United States who would be eligible for each measure, and if available, the number of plans that in the past were not able to report reliable Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set results to the National Committee for Quality Assurance because of low membership.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!