A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reliability of weight-bearing heel pad thickness measurements by ultrasound. | LitMetric

Reliability of weight-bearing heel pad thickness measurements by ultrasound.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)

School of Health, Physiotherapy, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK.

Published: June 1998

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of measuring weightbearing heel pad thickness in healthy subjects. BACKGROUND: Heel pad thickness has been reported to be an important factor in determining stresses observed in healthy as well as pathological feet. To date no published data are available on inter- and intra-operator variation in sonographic heel pad thickness measurements in adults. METHOD: bilateral heel pad thickness was measured in 10 adult subjects, with no history of plantar heel pain, by two experienced operators, on two separate occasions. Limits of agreement for three replicate measurements by each ultrasonographer and for replicate measurements were determined. RESULTS: Replicate heel pad thickness measurements in 95% of cases differ by less than 0.39 mm, and the magnitude of variations is similar when measurements are made by either single or different ultrasonographers, and were similar for right and left heel pad thickness measurements. Between scan measurements demonstrated a coefficient of variation of 3.2%. CONCLUSION: Weightbearing heel pad thickness measurements by ultrasound using a standardised technique in normal adult feet are reasonably reliable. RELEVANCE: Heel pad thickness can be measured reliably. Heel pad thickness may be an important predictor in the cause of ulceration in diabetics, and a potential risk factor in plantar pain affecting athletes. Further work assessing the heel pad in pathological conditions and athletes merits further study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00038-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heel pad
44
pad thickness
40
thickness measurements
20
heel
12
pad
11
thickness
10
measurements
9
measurements ultrasound
8
weightbearing heel
8
thickness measured
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!