Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
There is long-standing disagreement among experimentalists about whether transcallosal interhemispheric influences are primarily excitatory or inhibitory. Past computational models exploring this issue have encountered a similar dilemma: inhibitory callosal influences best explain hemispheric functional asymmetries, but excitatory callosal influences best explain transcallosal diaschisis. We recently hypothesized that this dilemma might be resolved by assuming excitatory callosal influences and a subcortical mechanism for cross-midline inhibition. Here we explore the feasibility of this hypothesis by examining a model of map formation in corresponding left and right cortical regions. The results show for the first time that both map asymmetries and diaschisis-like changes can be produced in a single model, suggesting that subcortical inhibitory processes may contribute more to asymmetric cortical functionality than is generally recognized.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200106130-00020 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!