AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the effectiveness and patient acceptance of Carisolv, a chemomechanical caries removal agent, in treating cavities in children's primary teeth compared to traditional air-motor techniques.
  • Carisolv was less efficient, with complete caries removal achieved in only 62.5% of sessions and significantly longer treatment times averaging nearly 7 minutes, while the air-motor took about 12 seconds on average.
  • Most children reported disliking Carisolv's taste and taking longer than expected, expressing a clear preference for the air-motor method, highlighting its limitations in clinical settings.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency and patient acceptance of the chemomechanical caries removal agent Carisolvtrade mark in deciduous teeth. Contralateral primary molars of sixteen 7- to 9-year-old patients (32 teeth) were treated with the air-motor and with Carisolv, respectively. Patients replied to a pre- and a postoperative questionnaire. Complete caries removal (CCR) was accomplished in all air-motor sessions. It was not achieved within the time limit of 15 min in 6 (37.5%) Carisolv sessions. Air-motor CCR time ranged between 6 and 18 s (mean: 11.81 s ). Carisolv CCR time, where accomplished within 15 min, ranged between 6 min 46 s and 13 min 57 s (mean: 6 min 51 s). Preoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the drilling, and that they would visit the dentist more often and prefer sitting in the chair longer if they could avoid it. Postoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the taste of Carisolv, estimated Carisolv to have taken longer, would not recommend it to their friends, and preferred the air-motor. In conclusion, Carisolv, although a step forward in terms of solution volume required, is not in a position to replace rotary instruments for caries removal: it did not remove decay completely in one third of our sample; it was much slower than the air-motor; it had a chlorine taste/odor our patients disliked.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000047457DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

caries removal
16
chemomechanical caries
8
primary molars
8
ccr time
8
min min
8
majority children
8
children reported
8
reported disliking
8
carisolv
6
air-motor
5

Similar Publications

Purpose: Coronectomy is a valuable treatment proven safe for non-pathological mandibular third molars with an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Coronectomy may also be useful for mandibular third molars with dentigerous cysts and caries, but this is not commonly performed due to the lack of well-designed, evidence-based studies. Here, we aim to investigate the safety of coronectomy for mandibular third molars with caries and dentigerous cysts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The development of laser technology has revolutionized dentistry, offering complementary and alternative approaches to traditional techniques. Lasers have been successfully integrated into various dental procedures, enhancing treatment outcomes and patient care. Several types of lasers can increase the acid resistance of enamel, thus preventing caries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large-scale screening identifies enzyme combinations that remove grown oral biofilm.

Biofilm

December 2024

Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Faculty of Natural Sciences, Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 14, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Bacteria in the oral cavity are responsible for the development of dental diseases such as caries and periodontitis, but it is becoming increasingly clear that the oral microbiome also benefits human health. Many oral care products on the market are antimicrobial, killing a large part of the oral microbiome but without removing the disease-causing biofilm. Instead, non-biocidal matrix-degrading enzymes may be used to selectively remove biofilm without harming the overall microbiome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Traditional access cavity preparation involves removing the roof of the pulp chamber and smoothing the dentin bulges at the root canal orifice, thereby creating straight-line access. However, this may damage more healthy dental tissue and reduce the tooth's fracture resistance. This case series presents a novel minimally invasive endodontic protocol for one maxillary canine and four mandibular premolars, which required root canal therapy due to labial/buccal cervical decay that caused pulpitis or periapical periodontitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!