Background/aims: As one of the methods for colorectal cancer screening, asymptomatic average-risk persons aged > or = 50 years are recommended to undergo flexible sigmoidoscopy screening every 5 years. We evaluate whether the interval between examinations can be extended beyond 5 years.
Methodology: A total of 192 asymptomatic average-risk subjects were studied, all of whom had undergone a initial negative examination on a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening at age > or = 50 years and a second examination at least 3 years later. The study population was divided into three groups according to the interval between examinations, which was 3-5 years in Group A, 5-6 years in Group B, and 6-8 years in Group C.
Results: The incidence of neoplasms was compared among the three subjects groups, and it was found to be similar: 11/96 (11.5%) in group A, 4/55 (7.3%) in group B, and 5/41 (12.2%) in group C. All detected adenomas were less than 10 mm in diameter, and none contained a villous component or high-grade dysplasia. No cancers were found in the study.
Conclusions: The results suggest that the interval for screening sigmoidoscopy may be extended beyond 5 years in persons showing negative results on an initial examination.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Explaining the Correlates of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) of Health Behavior Change in Visual (Structural) Colorectal Cancer Screening Examinations.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
January 2025
Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in terms of global cancer prevalence and is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality. Although CRC rates are decreasing in the United States, inequalities still exist despite the effectiveness of invasive screening methods, such as colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and computed tomography (CT) colonography in detecting colorectal cancer. Many current interventions promoting CRC screening do not utilize a modern theory-based approach, which has led to the low utilization of these screening methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Background And Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden, and screening can greatly reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Previous studies investigated the economic effects of CRC screening. We performed a systematic review to provide the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies across countries with different income levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDecreased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality associated with occasional positive screens following cancer screenings.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Positive results from cancer screenings, like a cancer diagnosis, can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality due to heightened psychological stress. However, positive screening results may also serve as a teachable moment to encourage the adoption of a healthier lifestyle. Consequently, the overall association between positive screenings and CVD mortality risk remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEvaluating the Use of Environmental and Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Risk-Based Surveillance Intervals.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol
December 2024
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Introduction: United States Multi-Society Task Force colonoscopy surveillance intervals are based solely on adenoma characteristics, without accounting for other risk factors. We investigated whether a risk model including demographic, environmental, and genetic risk factors could individualize surveillance intervals under an "equal management of equal risks" framework.
Methods: Using 14,069 individuals from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial who had a diagnostic colonoscopy following an abnormal flexible sigmoidoscopy, we modeled the risk of colorectal cancer, considering the diagnostic colonoscopy finding, baseline risk factors (e.
Extended flexible sigmoidoscopy using water exchange facilitates a complete colon examination without sedation in participants undergoing average risk colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
December 2024
Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!