Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the most sensitive and specific screening method for celiac disease. We tested three methods based on different principles, which all detect autoantibodies against the same antigen (tissue transglutaminase).

Methods: Sixty-two celiac children at the first biopsy (group 1), 78 celiac children on a gluten-free diet (group 2), 14 celiac children on a gluten-challenge (group 3), and 56 controls with a normal duodenal mucosa (group 4) were studied. The methods used were: 1) radioimmunoprecipitation assay using recombinant tissue transglutaminase (RIA); 2) commercial enzyme immunoassay using guinea pig tissue transglutaminase (ELISA); and 3) indirect immunofluorescence method for detection of antiendomysium antibodies (IF-EMA).

Results: RIA antitransglutaminase autoantibodies were detected in 100% of group 1, 43.6% of group 2, 100% of group 3, and none of the control subjects. ELISA antitransglutaminase autoantibodies were detected in 90.3% of group 1, 9% of group 2, 78.6% of group 3, and in none of the control subjects. IF-EMA were detected in 95.2% of group 1, 11.5% of group 2, 92.3% of group 3, and 1.8% of the controls.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a very high sensitivity and specificity of the RIA method to detect antitransglutaminase autoantibodies in comparison to ELISA and IF-EMA assays. We can explain this finding with the use of human recombinant antigen and the increased capacity of the RIA method to detect low titers of autoantibodies. If our data are confirmed by studies on larger series, tissue transglutaminase RIA could be proposed as the best screening method for celiac patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03754.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antitransglutaminase autoantibodies
16
group
13
screening method
12
method celiac
12
celiac children
12
tissue transglutaminase
12
detect antitransglutaminase
8
sensitive specific
8
specific screening
8
celiac disease
8

Similar Publications

A new chemiluminescence immunoassay method (CLIA) for detecting IgA anti-transglutaminase (atTG IgA) in celiac disease (CD) has prompted inquiries into its diagnostic performance. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CLIA with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA). We searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases up to March 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gluten sensitivity (GS) is one of the gluten-related disorders (GRDs). Patients with GS may have serum antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (IgA and IgG) without any evidence of enteropathy. We aimed to evaluate both tTG-6 and tTG-2 antibodies to determine the prevalence of seropositive tTG-2 and tTG-6 antibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • In vitro models studying autoimmunity often lack the complex immune environment and epithelial interactions necessary for accurate research, particularly regarding coeliac disease (CeD), which involves gluten triggering immune responses.
  • Researchers created air-liquid interface (ALI) duodenal organoids from biopsies, preserving both epithelial cells and local immune cells, allowing for a more realistic study of CeD.
  • The findings highlighted that gluten peptides led to significant epithelial damage in CeD organoids, mediated by immune responses including the action of IL-7, a critical factor in the disease's pathology, especially in active cases compared to those on gluten-free diets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Point-of-care tests (POCTs) may have a role in detecting undiagnosed cases of Celiac disease (CD). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel POCT, compared with the conventional serological methods, for simultaneous anti-transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and anti-deamidated gliadin (DGP) IgG antibody detection. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of different biological matrices (whole blood and serum) on test performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Strategies for diagnosing celiac disease (CD) include case-finding and population-screening programs. Case finding consists of testing individuals at increased risk for the disease due to symptoms or associated conditions. Screening programs are widespread campaigns, which definitely perform better in terms of unveiling CD diagnoses but nowadays are still debatable.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!