Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether there have been any significant changes in the demographics and perioperative care of FIGO stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years and, if so, to quantify them.
Methods: Since July 1984, all patients with FIGO stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer undergoing radical surgery by members of our division have been entered into a prospective database. Selection for surgery has been unchanged over the past 16 years. Since March 1994 and November 1996, one surgeon has performed radical vaginal trachelectomy and laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy, respectively. Statistical analysis used Spearman's correlation analysis, the proportional hazards regression model of Cox, and the Mantel-Hanzel test was performed. Due to the number of statistical analyses, statistical significance was defined as P < 0.01.
Results: Eight hundred sixty-four patients have undergone radical surgery (784 radical hysterectomy, 42 radical vaginal trachelectomy, 32 radical vaginal hysterectomy, 6 radical abdominal trachelectomy) for FIGO stage IA(2)/IB(1) carcinoma of the cervix by members of our division since 1984. There have been no changes in the median age (40 years), tumor size (2.0 cm), incidence of capillary lymphatic space involvement (47%), or positive pelvic lymph nodes (6%) over the past 16 years. The median Quetelet index (24.6), depth of tumor invasion (squamous cell carcinomas only) (6.0 mm), and proportion of patients with comorbid conditions (17%) have increased over time (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, and P < 0.001, respectively). Pathologically, there has been an increase in the proportion of adenocarcinomas (28%) and a decrease in the proportion of grade 3 tumors (28%) (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The median operating time (2.8 h), hospital stay (7.0 days), blood loss (600 cc), allogeneic blood transfusion (23%), postoperative infections (13%), and noninfectious complications (6%) have all decreased (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). There has been no change in the incidence of positive surgical margins (3%), adjuvant radiation (13%), or recurrence-free survival (2 and 5 years, 94 and 90%, respectively) after a median follow-up of 45 months.
Conclusion: Despite no substantive changes in the selection criteria for surgery and the small time interval studied (16 years), almost all indices of operative and postoperative morbidity analyzed have decreased significantly. These changes have occurred without an increase in the use of adjuvant radiation or decrease in recurrence-free survival. Although little progress has been made in the cure rates associated with surgical management of FIGO stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer during this time interval, it appears that the morbidity of surgery has decreased.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6158 | DOI Listing |
Curr Oncol
May 2024
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.
The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial was published in 2018 and demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) yields inferior survival outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer compared to open surgery. This study investigates how the results of the LACC trial have impacted the selection of the primary treatment modality and adjuvant radiation utilization in early-stage cervical cancer. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we compared patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer before (1/2016-12/2017) and after (1/2019-12/2020) the LACC trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
April 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China.
Objective: Radical hysterectomy has long been considered as the standard surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 to IB1 stages), according to the 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology. This study aims to conduct an in-depth evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of non-radical surgery as an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Methods: A systematic search of online databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant literature on surgical treatment options for early-stage cervical cancer.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2024
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Objective: To compare the pelvic lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma stage IA2-IB1 undergoing hysterectomy and/or trachelectomy plus lymphadenectomy, according to Silva's classification system.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in two Colombian cancer centers. The cases were classified according to the Silva classification system.
Eur J Surg Oncol
April 2024
Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria Della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy; Medical Area Department (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Background: This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis aims to compare the surgery-related results and oncological outcomes between SH and RH in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Method: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane to collect studies that compared oncological and surgery-related outcomes between SH and RH groups in patients with stage IA2 and IB1 cervical cancer. A random-effect model calculated the weighted average difference of each primary outcome via Review Manager V.
Front Oncol
November 2023
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Background: Radical hysterectomy (RH) is considered a cornerstone in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. However, the debate surrounding the optimal surgical approach, whether minimally invasive or open surgery, remains controversial. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients who undergo different surgical approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!