Microwave cooking of legumes such as chickpeas and common beans was evaluated by assessing the cooking quality (cooking time, firmness, cooking losses, and water uptake) and the physicochemical, nutritional, and microstructural modifications in starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Compared to conventional cooking, microwave cooking with sealed vessels enabled a drastic reduction in cooking time, from 110 to 11 min for chickpeas and from 55 to 9 min for common beans. The solid losses, released in the cooking water, were significantly less after microwave cooking than after conventional cooking (6.5 vs 10.6 g/100 g of dry seed in chickpeas and 4.5 vs 7.5 g/100 g of dry seed in common beans). Both cooking procedures produced a redistribution of the insoluble nonstarch polysaccharides to soluble fraction, although the total nonstarch polysaccharides were not affected. Increases in in vitro starch digestibility were similar after both cooking processes, since the level of resistant starch decreased from 27.2 and 32.5% of total starch in raw chickpeas and beans, respectively, to about 10% in cooked samples and the level of rapidly digestible starch increased from 35.6 and 27.5% to about 80%. SEM studies showed that the cotyledons maintained a regular structure although most of the cell wall was broken down and shattered by both cooking procedures. In addition, the ultrastructural modifications in the cotyledon's parenchima and cells are consistent with the chemical modifications in NSP and the increase in starch digestibility after cooking.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0008083 | DOI Listing |
Food Chem
January 2025
Laboratory of Food Technology, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, PB 2457, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:
Pulse flours consisting of isolated cotyledon cells (ICC) have been incorporated in foods with delayed amylolysis. To optimize the cost-benefit ratio, understanding how the dosage of cellular ingredient affects starch digestibility is essential. Therefore, dose-response relationships were established to evaluate the sensitivity of amylolysis kinetics to the inclusion of intact cells in whole common bean-based flours.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Plant Pathology Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a crop rich in protein, minerals, and starch. Viruses are a significant limiting factor in increasing the production of legumes, particularly common beans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Bot
January 2025
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
This article comments on: 2025. A dTALE approach demonstrates that induction of common bean promotes resistance to common bacterial blight. Journal of Experimental Botany , 607–620.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFood Chem
March 2025
Centro para Investigaciones en Granos y Semillas, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501 San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica. Electronic address:
Common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are widely consumed legumes in Latin America and Africa, valued for their nutritional compounds and antioxidants. Their high polyphenol content contributes to the antioxidant properties, with bioactive compounds showing antifungal and antimycotoxin effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
The cultivation of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in semi-arid regions is affected by drought. To explore potential alleviation strategies, we investigated the impact of inoculation with Bacillus velezensis, and the application of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) via foliage application (FA), which promote plant growth and enhance stress tolerance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!