A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Airway responses to a diluent used in the methacholine challenge test. | LitMetric

Airway responses to a diluent used in the methacholine challenge test.

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

Pharmaceutical Research Associates Inc., Lenexa, Kansas, USA.

Published: March 2001

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study reviewed 3,902 methacholine challenge tests over six years to analyze the impact of diluent inhalation on lung function measurements (FEV1 and FVC).
  • There were significant changes in lung function post-diluent, with a strong correlation between baseline and post-diluent PC20 values, suggesting these changes may affect quantitative assessments.
  • The findings indicate that while the diluent stage may not be necessary for qualitative reports of airway function, it is recommended if precise measurements like PC20 are being evaluated.

Article Abstract

Background: Inhalation of diluent is often used in performing methacholine challenge tests, but its elimination has been suggested because marked falls in FEV1 after diluent inhalation have not been documented and performing this step is time-consuming.

Objective: We investigated the frequency and magnitude of response to the inhalation of diluent, and if there were any systematic effects in determining the PC20 using the baseline and postdiluent spirometric measurements.

Methods: All methacholine challenges performed during a 6-year period (N = 3,902) were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: The maximum increase and decrease in FEV1 and FVC from baseline were 56.3% and -41.4%, respectively, and 61.7% and -40.3%, respectively. The mean absolute changes from baseline in FEV1 and FVC were -0.018 L and -0.026 L, respectively. There was a highly significant correlation (r2 = 0.96; P < .0001) between the PC20 baseline and PC20 postdiluent values, and a mean difference of 0.041 mg/mL (P < .0001), with the PC20 postdiluent being higher.

Conclusions: These data do not provide strong evidence to support either using or eliminating the diluent stage. It is clear that there are frequent and sometimes large changes in FVC and FEV1 after the inhalation of diluent containing phenol and sodium bicarbonate buffer. If a laboratory intends to report changes in airway function qualitatively (ie, positive or negative), the diluent stage may not be necessary. However, if a laboratory intends to report bronchial challenge data from inhaling methacholine in a quantitative fashion and report a continuous variable such as PC20, a diluent stage is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63298-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inhalation diluent
12
diluent stage
12
diluent
8
methacholine challenge
8
pc20 baseline
8
fev1 fvc
8
0001 pc20
8
pc20 postdiluent
8
laboratory intends
8
intends report
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!