AIM: The purpose of the study was to assess the acceptability to consumers of two methods of induction of labour using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) approach. The methods compared were amniotomy plus oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel, followed by oxytocin if necessary. METHODS: A description of each method was presented, in questionnaire format, to pregnant women attending a public hospital ante-natal clinic. Women were asked to choose one of the two treatments, then give a valuation in dollar terms for both their preferred treatment and the alternative. RESULTS: It was found that 73.7% of patients preferred gel. The mean maximum WTP for amniotomy plus oxytocin was Aus$133 while that for gel was Aus$178 (P=0.0001). Those who chose amniotomy plus oxytocin were WTP 90% more for their preferred treatment compared with the alternative (Aus$180 vs. Aus$95). Similarly, those who preferred gel were WTP 90% more for their preferred treatment compared with the alternative (Aus$222 vs. Aus$119). CONCLUSION: Consumers were able to assess drug information provided on the two therapies, make an informed choice and to value that choice. Information obtained in this way, combined with information on costs, could be used in policy decision-making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5080968PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00098.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amniotomy oxytocin
12
preferred treatment
12
labour willingness-to-pay
8
preferred gel
8
wtp 90%
8
90% preferred
8
treatment compared
8
compared alternative
8
preferred
5
measurement consumer
4

Similar Publications

Tugging the Foley Catheter Balloon Every Three Hours in Induction of Labor After One Previous Cesarean: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Jalan Profesor Diraja Ungku Aziz, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • Induction of labor after a previous cesarean poses high risks, and using a Foley balloon for mechanical ripening is preferred over prostaglandins due to lower risk of complications like uterine rupture.
  • This study aims to assess the effects of tugging the Foley balloon every three hours on the time from induction to delivery and overall patient satisfaction compared to standard care without tugging.
  • Conducted as a randomized controlled trial in Malaysia from April 2023 to March 2024, 126 participants were recruited, and outcomes measured included the time interval from balloon insertion to delivery and participants' satisfaction, with expectations of a significant reduction in delivery time and improvement in satisfaction scores.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of membrane sweeping and transcervical Foley catheters for the induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery.

Methods: An open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed at Sibu Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia between 15 February 2018 and 30 August 2018. Pregnant women aged 18 or above at term who had one previous uncomplicated lower segment cesarean section and required induction of labor were randomized to membrane sweeping or transcervical Foley catheter insertion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone vaginal insert (PROPESS) and double balloon cook catheter in term nulliparous pregnancies.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res

January 2025

Department of Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan City, P.R. China.

Article Synopsis
  • - The study compared two methods for inducing labor in first-time mothers: dinoprostone vaginal insert (PROPESS) and double balloon cook catheter (DBC), with a focus on delivery outcomes.
  • - Results showed similar overall vaginal delivery rates, but PROPESS had a significantly higher rate of successful vaginal deliveries within 24 hours compared to DBC (55.45% vs. 38.43%).
  • - While DBC had a higher occurrence of complications like chorioamnionitis and required more oxytocin for labor augmentation, neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Induction of labor in late-term pregnancy: amniotomy plus early oxytocin perfusion versus amniotomy plus oxytocin perfusion delayed by 24 h.

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod

November 2024

Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France; Department LTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, University of Rennes, Rennes, F35000, France.

Objective: To assess the maternal and fetal benefits of delaying oxytocin perfusion by 24 h following labor induction by amniotomy after 41 weeks of gestation (WG).

Methods: We performed a retrospective review including all women with a vertex presentation fetus who had an indication for labor induction by amniotomy with or without oxytocin after 41 WG between 2015 and 2022. Patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy followed by oxytocin perfusion within 0 to 4 hours (early oxytocin group: EO group) were compared with patients who underwent an IOL by amniotomy alone or followed by an oxytocin perfusion after an expectant period for up to 24 hours in the absence of a spontaneous onset of labor (delayed oxytocin group: DO group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Conducted as a randomized controlled trial with 210 participants, results showed no significant difference in the amniotomy-to-delivery interval or maternal satisfaction between the two time frames.
  • * However, the 8-hour examination group experienced a lower cesarean rate and was less likely to have scheduled examinations compared to the 4-hour group, indicating potential benefits to the longer waiting period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!