Harm reduction - a historical view from the left.

Int J Drug Policy

Center for Drug Use and HIV Research, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., Two World Trade Center, 16th floor, 10048, NY, USA

Published: April 2001

The harm reduction movement formed during a period in which social movements of the working class and the excluded were weak, neo-liberalism ideologically triumphant, and potential opposition movements were viewed as offering "tinkering" with the system rather than a total social alternative. This climate shaped and limited the perspectives, strategies, and tactics of harm reductionists almost everywhere. In many countries, this period was also marked by a "political economy of scapegoating" that often targeted drug users as the cause of social woes. This scapegoating took the form of "divide and rule" political initiatives by business and political leaderships to prevent social unrest in a long period of worldwide economic trends toward lowered profit rates and toward increasing income inequality. However, times have changed. Mass strikes and other labor struggles, opposition to the World Trade Organisation and other agencies of neo-liberalism, community-based protests against belt-tightening, and other forms of social unrest have been increasing in many countries. This opens up the possibility of new allies for the harm reduction movement, but also poses difficult problems for which we need to develop answers. On-the-ground experience in alliance formation needs to be combined with careful discussion of and research about what approaches work to convince other movements to work for and with harm reduction, and which approaches do not. Class differences within the harm reduction movement are likely to become more salient in terms of (a) creating internal tensions, (b) increasingly, opening up new ways in which working class harm reductionists can organize within their own communities and workplaces, and (c) producing different strategic orientations that will need to be discussed and debated. As a movement, we will need to find ways to accommodate and discuss differing perspectives, needs, and assessments of opportunities and threats without paralyzing harm reduction activities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0955-3959(01)00063-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

harm reduction
24
reduction movement
12
harm
8
working class
8
harm reductionists
8
social unrest
8
reduction
5
social
5
reduction historical
4
historical view
4

Similar Publications

Background: Smoking prevalence among U.S. adults experiencing homelessness is ≥70 %.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The global emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2019 posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems, disrupting routine services and necessitating swift adaptations. Harm reduction programs, vital for addressing substance use-related health risks, faced unique challenges during the pandemic, impacting vulnerable populations. This study focuses on the repercussions of Covid-19 on harm reduction policies in Iran, specifically examining the distribution of condoms, syringes, and methadone to high-risk individuals attending Triangle Centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implementing recycling in the operating room: a single-center experience.

Surg Endosc

January 2025

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Healthcare Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada Di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

Background: Climate change poses significant challenges to global health, exacerbated by healthcare systems' carbon footprint and waste generation. Surgical activities contribute to these impacts, necessitating sustainable practices to mitigate environmental harm. This study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a recycling program in reducing waste, carbon emissions, and disposal costs in the operating rooms (ORs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Use of nicotine products, prescription drug products, and other methods to stop smoking by US adults in the 2022 National Health Interview Survey.

Intern Emerg Med

January 2025

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • A recent CDC survey analyzed methods used by US adults to stop smoking, showing that around 2.9 million adults successfully quit for at least 6 months in the last year.
  • Most successful quitters were younger, educated, male, non-Hispanic White, and commonly used nicotine products, especially e-cigarettes, compared to less popular options like prescription drugs.
  • The study highlights that many adults still try to quit smoking without support, suggesting a need for targeted interventions to help those who struggle the most in quitting, using proven methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!