Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study.

Arch Surg

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Published: March 2001

Hypothesis: For temporary fecal diversion, transverse colostomy (TC) has superior safety, but loop ileostomy (LI) has superior management qualities.

Methods: Of patients with TC or LI seen between 1988 and 1997, 63 patients were matched for diagnosis, operative procedure, and date of surgery. The 2 groups were then compared for hospital/postoperative mortality and morbidity and stoma complications.

Results: Mortality rates were 6.3% for the TC group and 1.6% for the LI group (P =.25). Morbidity rates for stoma creation and for stoma closure were 47.6% and 10% (P =.19), respectively, for the TC group, and 36.5% and 6.3% (P>.99), respectively, for the LI group. Most morbidity events were minor, and neither procedure-related nor other medical complications showed a significant difference between the groups. However, patients with a TC were significantly more likely to experience skin trouble around the stoma (TC vs LI, 15.9% vs 3.2%) and leakage around the stoma (TC vs LI, 12.7% vs 1.6%).

Conclusions: Regarding safety, TC and LI should be considered equivalent options for temporary fecal diversion. We recommend further study comparing the 2 procedures with regard to patient perception and quality of life.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.136.3.338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transverse colostomy
8
loop ileostomy
8
temporary fecal
8
fecal diversion
8
stoma
5
temporary transverse
4
colostomy loop
4
ileostomy diversion
4
diversion case-matched
4
case-matched study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!