Characteristics of the 'clinical value index' (Harding et al., 1973) are examined. It is shown that the definition of the index makes it unsuitable for the comparative evaluation of various methods of assessing the results of an oral glucose tolerance test.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1975.tb03303.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!