A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Quality analysis of clinical practice guidelines on cardiovascular risks in the Basque country and a proposal for their evaluacion]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the implementation and quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for managing major cardiovascular risks, specifically tobacco dependency, hypertension, hyperlipaemia, and diabetes.
  • A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in primary care centers in the Basque Country, where 170 CPGs were collected from 77 responding centers, revealing varying compliance with established quality criteria.
  • The findings highlighted significant quality deficiencies in the guidelines, particularly concerning bibliographic support, conditions for application, and recognition of authors and reviewers, prompting the proposal of a model for better evaluation of CPG quality.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To find the implantation and quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) to manage the major cardiovascular risks: tobacco dependency, hypertension, hyperlipaemia and diabetes mellitus. To work out a model to evaluate the quality of the CPG in primary care.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study.

Setting: The primary care centres of the Basque Country.

Participants: 170 CPG used at present to manage the four mentioned cardiovascular risks.

Measurements And Main Results: Information was requested on the use of CPG and copies of their guidelines were requested from those in charge of 103 ranked centres. 77 centres replied (76%), of which 66 said they used one of them. A total of 170 CPG were received. On the basis of non-specific prior proposals for primary care, 21 quality criteria for the CPG, grouped in 6 blocks, were drawn up. Top quality was found in the block for clarity of clinical procedure with 63% compliance with the CPG, followed by general description (54%), and evaluation and measurement of impact (30%). The blocks with worst compliance were identification of people involved in their design (23%), evidence of their recommendations (19%) and conditions of application (4%).

Conclusions: A model was proposed to evaluate the quality of the CPG. Major deficiencies in quality were found. These were most marked in key aspects such as bibliographic support for their recommendations, envisaging of conditions for application and identification of authors and reviewers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7679647PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78728-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical practice
8
practice guidelines
8
cardiovascular risks
8
cpg
8
cpg manage
8
evaluate quality
8
quality cpg
8
primary care
8
170 cpg
8
conditions application
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!