Currently available test models for the differentiation of photoallergic and photoirritant reactions are extremely time consuming and the protocols are very heterogeneous. In vitro tests are of proven value in predicting irritant or toxic effects, but these tests fail to predict chemical-induced allergic side effects. We developed test systems for this endpoint which is not easily detected by existing assays. In a previous publication we were able to discriminate between a contact sensitizer and a skin irritant with a combination of primary ear swelling analysis and cell counting of the ear-draining lymph nodes [Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 153 (1998) 83; Arch. Toxicol. 73 (2000) 501]. This combination of tests was called the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant Skin reactions (IMDS). In addition, it had been shown before that inclusion of UV irradiation in the local lymph node assay enables discrimination of photoallergic from photoirritant reactions after dermal application [Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 10 (1994) 57]. Because of the fact that fluoroquinolones are known to induce photoreactions after oral but not dermal treatment, the aim of the present study was to apply the IMDS for the fast and reliable differentiation of photoreactions due to fluoroquinolones after oral treatment. Enoxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin and BAY y 3118 were tested in this system. We found a good correlation between the results of UV light-irradiated IMDS and a guinea pig model with the quinolones as far as photoirritancy was concerned. This holds true also for the photoallergic standard olaquindox and the photoirritant standard 8-methoxypsoralen. However, in contrast to the guinea pig assays the IMDS is fast and extremely predictive for the risk of both photosensitization and photoirritancy depending on the route of exposure. Thus, the UV light-irradiated IMDS turned out to be a good tool for the preclinical risk assessment procedure in terms of discriminating photoreactions. In addition, flow cytometric analyses were used to underline the fact that antigen-independent activation occurred after the induction of photoirritant reactions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1011-1344(00)00097-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

photoirritant reactions
12
integrated model
8
model differentiation
8
skin reactions
8
photoallergic photoirritant
8
chemical-induced allergic
8
imds fast
8
light-irradiated imds
8
guinea pig
8
reactions
5

Similar Publications

Topical sunscreens decrease the quantity of ultraviolet (UV) light from the sun reaching the skin by either blocking or scattering it and help protect the skin from dyspigmentation, photoaging, DNA damage, and photocarcinogenesis, especially in photosensitive individuals. The significant role played by visible light and infrared light in skin pigmentation and photoaging has been recognized in recent years. The majority of broad-spectrum sunscreens protect against UV-B (290-320nm) and UV-A (320-400nm) radiation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phototoxic reactions are among the most common skin-related adverse effects induced by drugs. It is believed that the binding of chemicals to melanin biopolymers is a significant factor influencing skin toxicity. The formation of drug-melanin complexes can lead to the accumulation of drugs or their photodegradation products in pigmented cells, potentially affecting phototoxic reactions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cellular damage photosensitized by dasatinib, radical-mediated mechanisms and photoprotection in reconstructed epidermis.

Free Radic Biol Med

November 2024

Departamento de Química-Instituto de Tecnología Química UPV-CSIC, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera S/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain; Unidad Mixta de Investigación UPV-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Avenida de Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • - Dasatinib (DAS) is an anticancer drug mainly used for oral treatment of blood cancers, but it's being researched for topical use, raising concerns about potential photosensitivity reactions.
  • - The study investigates DAS’s phototoxic effects on cells by simulating its application on skin and found that it can generate reactive species that cause damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA when exposed to UVA light.
  • - Tests indicated that DAS exhibits significant phototoxicity, but combining it with a specific formulation mitigated this side effect, suggesting a safer approach for its topical application.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

MLtox, online phototoxicity prediction webpage.

Toxicol In Vitro

February 2024

Faculty of Informatics and Information Technologies, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Ilkovičova 2, Bratislava, Slovakia; Center of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava, Slovakia. Electronic address:

Phototoxicity, sometimes in the literature referred to as photo-irritation, is a chemically induced reaction requiring light. While it is generally accepted that phototoxicity testing can be performed in the majority of cases in vitro (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Phytophotodermatitis is a skin condition caused by exposure to certain plants with phototoxic chemicals, followed by sunlight, leading to skin irritation and damage.
  • A case study of a 55-year-old man showed he developed painful skin lesions after handling figs in the sun, which were diagnosed as phytophotodermatitis through testing.
  • Diagnosis involves a thorough patient history and testing to identify plant triggers, and while the condition is usually self-limiting, avoiding the specific plants is recommended for prevention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!