A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Unilateral hepatic artery reconstruction is unnecessary in biliary tract carcinomas involving lobar hepatic artery: implications of interlobar hepatic artery and its preservation. | LitMetric

Background/aims: The interruption of hepatic arterial flow when performing a bilioenteric anastomosis has been reported to usually bring about serious postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, hepatic abscess and infarction. We aimed to evaluate the surgical implications of the interlobar hepatic artery when patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas undergo surgical resection with a bilioenteric anastomosis.

Methodology: In 7 patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas, the combined resection of the liver (greater than hemihepatectomy in 2 and less than hemihepatectomy in 5), extrahepatic bile duct, hepatic artery (right hepatic artery in 5, right and left hepatic artery in 1, left hepatic artery in 1), and the portal vein was performed in 4 patients. The portal vein was reconstructed in all 4 patients. The hepatic artery was reconstructed in only one patient, with combined resection of both right and left hepatic arteries, but was not reconstructed in 2 other patients, even though they underwent resection greater than hemihepatectomy.

Results: The interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence could be preserved in 5 patients, as shown by angiography, but could not be preserved in 2 patients who underwent greater than hemihepatectomy. Moderate and transient ischemic liver damage occurred, but no serious postoperative complications were induced in any of the 5 patients in the unilateral hepatic artery preserved group. However, both cases without preservation of the hepatic artery encountered liver failure, liver abscess and leakage of bilioenteric anastomosis, and one patient died of multiple organ failure.

Conclusions: One major lobar branch of the hepatic artery involved by cancer invasion could be safely resected without reconstruction in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas when the interlobar hepatic artery running into the Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct confluence is preserved.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hepatic artery
56
hepatic
18
biliary tract
16
tract carcinomas
16
interlobar hepatic
16
artery
14
patients advanced
12
advanced biliary
12
left hepatic
12
patients
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!