New forms of ventricular pacing are increasingly studied as an option in the management of patients with heart failure. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most frequent cause of heart failure, and patients with complete left or right bundle branch block (LBBB and RBBB) and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are the best candidates for this new therapy. However, the prevalence of this clinical presentation is uncertain. During a 1-year period, 433 patients with documented CAD (mean age 64 +/- 10 years, 79% men) who were referred for myocardial perfusion imaging were prospectively studied. All patients underwent a 2-day stress-rest gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin SPECT study with evaluation of resting LV enddiastolic (LVEDV) and endsystolic (LVESV) volumes and LVEF. The resting ECG was examined in all patients for the presence of complete LBBB or RBBB. Of the 433 patients with CAD 36 patients (8.3%) had LBBB (n = 14) or RBBB (n = 22) and a QRS width > 120 ms. These 36 patients were in general older and more frequently had diabetes and atrial fibrillation. Patients with LBBB or RBBB had a significantly lower LVEF (41 +/- 16% vs 48 +/- 14%, P < 0.01) and significantly higher LV volumes compared to patients without LBBB or RBBB (177 +/- 79 mL vs 131 +/- 53 mL, P < 0.001 for LVEDV and 116 +/- 76 mL vs 73 +/- 49 mL, P < 0.001 for LVESV). In total, 112/433 (26%) had an LVEF < or = 40%; 16 had also a LBBB or RBBB (3.7% of the whole population, 14% of the patients with a LVEF < or = 40%). Within the group of patients with a LVEF > or = 40%, patients with BBB had comparable LVEF (26 +/- 9% vs 30 +/- 8%, P = NS) but significantly higher LVEDV and LVESV (230 +/- 70 mL vs 190 +/- 64 mL, P < 0.05 for LVEDV and 170 +/- 65 mL vs 135 +/- 56 mL, P < 0.05 for LVESV). In this prospective registry 3.7% of all patients with known CAD had LBBB or RBBB in combination with a LVEF < or = 40%. This represented 14% of all patients with a LVEF > or = 40%. These limited numbers should be kept in mind when considering biventricular pacing as a new therapeutic options in patients with heart failure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07003.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lbbb rbbb
28
lvef 40%
20
patients
17
+/-
13
heart failure
12
patients lvef
12
lvef
9
biventricular pacing
8
coronary artery
8
artery disease
8

Similar Publications

Autocorrelation maps for optimal setting in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Comput Methods Programs Biomed

December 2024

Institute of Measurement Science, Department of Biomeasurements, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on using implanted devices to aid patients with chronic heart failure by analyzing ECG signals, specifically looking at the timing of stimulation/pacing based on QRS duration.
  • Researchers evaluated the autocorrelation maps from body surface potential maps of 17 patients, most of whom had left bundle branch block (LBBB), to find differences in heart rhythms compared to healthy controls.
  • The results indicate that certain autocorrelation parameters could serve as additional metrics for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing settings, particularly for patients who respond well to treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) correlate with increased hospital mortality, particularly with RBBB patterns.* -
  • In a study involving 18,009 ACS patients, 627 with VPDs showed a higher hospital mortality rate (7.8%) compared to those without (4.9%).* -
  • The presence of RBBB pattern in VPDs is linked to higher hospital mortality, while VPDs with a superior axis are associated with increased post-discharge mortality.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Right bundle branch block in suspected acute coronary syndromes: Diagnostic challenges, treatment and prognosis.

J Electrocardiol

December 2024

Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg and Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Medicine-Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Nykoebing F, Denmark. Electronic address:

Background: There is still conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic implications of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in the general population but also in patients with heart diseases like acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In accordance with current guidelines, RBBB in ACS patients is considered as STEMI equivalent. However, recent studies indicate that further differentiation is necessary in this group, as we will outline below.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of idiopathic premature ventricular beats (PVBs) in children, evaluating 73 patients under 18 with structurally normal hearts.
  • Retrospective analysis showed that 50.7% of the patients experienced complete recovery of PVBs after a median follow-up of 15 months, with varying recovery rates based on the frequency of PVBs but no significant differences observed in other patient characteristics.
  • Overall, the research concluded that idiopathic PVBs in children tend to regress naturally over time, and no serious cardiac complications were reported during the follow-up period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Influence of Right and Left Bundle Branch Block in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest.

Crit Care Med

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the impact of right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), focusing on 30-day mortality rates.
  • It involved 248 adult patients from an ICU in Germany, finding that those with RBBB had the highest mortality at 72.5%, compared to 52.9% for LBBB and 50.0% for no block.
  • RBBB significantly predicted increased mortality even after adjusting for key health indicators, while LBBB showed no significant association with mortality outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!