Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known hazard of radiological procedures.
Aim: To compare the emission of secondary ionizing radiation from two coronary angiographic equipment, one with digital and the other with analog image generation. To evaluate the effectiveness of external radiological protection devices.
Material And Methods: Environmental and fluoroscopy generated radiation in the cephalic region of the patient was measured during diagnostic coronary angiographies. Ionizing radiation generated in anterior left oblique projection (ALO) and in anterior right oblique projection (ARO) were measured with and without leaded protections. In 19 patients (group 1), a digital equipment was used and in 21 (group 2), an analog equipment.
Results: Header radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 1194 +/- 337 and 364 +/- 222 microGray/h respectively (p < 0.001). During fluoroscopy and with leaded protection generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 612 +/- 947 and 70 +/- 61 microGray/h respectively (p < 0.001). For ALO projection, generated radiation for groups 1 and 2 was 105 +/- 47 and 71 +/- 192 microGray/h respectively (p < 0.001). During filming the radiation for ALO projection for groups 1 and 2 was 7252 +/- 9569 and 1671 +/- 2038 microGray/h respectively (p = 0.03). Out of the protection zone, registered radiation during fluoroscopy for groups 1 and 2 was 2800 +/- 1741 and 1318 +/- 954 microGray/h respectively (p < 0.001); during filming, the figures were 15,500 +/- 5840 and 18,961 +/- 10,599 microGray/h respectively (NS).
Conclusions: Digital radiological equipment has a lower level of ionizing radiation emission than the analog equipment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Life Sci Space Res (Amst)
February 2025
Institute for High Energy Physics named by A.A. Logunov of NRC "Kurchatov Institute", Protvino, Russia.
Exposure to ionizing radiation during manned deep space missions to Mars could lead to functional impairments of the central nervous system, which may compromise the success of the mission and affect the quality of life for returning astronauts. Along with radiation-induced changes in cognitive abilities and emotional status, the effects of increased motor activity were observed. The mechanisms behind these phenomena still remain unresolved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife Sci Space Res (Amst)
February 2025
Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 76A Khoroshevskoye shosse, 123007, Moscow, Russian Federation.
One of the most problematic goals for radiation safety during spaceflight is an assessment of additional doses received by astronauts during extravehicular activity (EVA). The Pille-ISS thermoluminescent dosimeter developed by the predecessor of the Hungarian Research Network (HUN-REN) Centre for Energy Research (Budapest, Hungary) is designed for the routine dose measurements not only inside the spacecraft compartments, but also for personal dosimetric control for EVA. During almost two decades of the International Space Station (ISS) operation, the unique set of 131 EVA doses were recorded in different conditions, such as: solar activity, ISS trajectory along the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), and shielding conditions provided by two kinds of spacesuits: the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) and Orlan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife Sci Space Res (Amst)
February 2025
Division of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Future long duration space missions will expose astronauts to higher doses of galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) than those experienced on the international space station. Recent studies have demonstrated astronauts may be at risk for cardiovascular complications due to increased radiation exposure and fluid shift from microgravity. However, there is a lack of direct evidence on how the cardiovascular system is affected by GCR and microgravity since no astronauts have been exposed to exploratory mission relevant GCR doses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife Sci Space Res (Amst)
February 2025
Gulhane School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
Space missions have revealed certain disincentive factors of this unique environment, such as microgravity, cosmic radiation, etc., as the aerospace industry has made substantial progress in exploring deep space and its impacts on human body. Galactic cosmic radiation (GCR), a form of ionizing radiation, is one of those environmental factors that has potential health implications and, as a result, may limit the duration - and possibly the occurrence - of deep-space missions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife Sci Space Res (Amst)
February 2025
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, United States.
The BioSentinel CubeSat was deployed on the Artemis-I mission in November 2022 and has been continuously transmitting physical measurements of the space radiation environment since that time. Just before mission launch, we published computational model predictions of the galactic cosmic ray exposure expected inside BioSentinel for multiple locations and configurations. The predictions utilized models for the ambient galactic cosmic ray environment, radiation physics and transport, and BioSentinel geometry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!