In the late 1970s, improved cement technique was introduced in an attempt to address the problem of early cemented stem loosening. Subsequently, numerous centers reported stem survival rates of >95% beyond 10 years. Long-term cemented stem fixation was believed widely to be consistently obtainable in most patients. Despite the widespread clinical success of these early cemented stems, numerous changes were introduced in stem design and cement technique. In more recent years, a surprising number of series of early failures of cemented stems have been reported. Some designs consistently have had a high early failure rate. Others have failed infrequently, but the failures have occurred early and with extensive osteolysis. Numerous causes have been proposed, including poor cement technique, undersized broaches, increased stem offset, decreased stem length, rough surface finish, and circular stem cross-section. Failures often are multifactorial and defy a simple explanation based on a single parameter. Results of cemented stems are more variable than previously appreciated. There are nuances of cemented stem design, cement technique, and patient selection that can lead to early failure and that are not understood completely at present. Given the availability of many cemented designs with proven records of clinical success, new design features should be introduced prudently with extensive premarket testing, limited clinical release, and careful postmarket surveillance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/arth.2000.16498 | DOI Listing |
Iowa Orthop J
January 2025
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background: Cementless stems are commonly used in hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures. Recent studies have reported increased risk of periprosthetic fracture with cementless stems compared to cemented HA. In elective total hip arthroplasty (THA), lower proximal canal fill ratios (CFR) of cementless stems have been associated with worse outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev
January 2025
From the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO (Dr. Amin, Dr. Krumme, Dr. Gause, Dr. Dubin, and Dr. Cil), and the Department of Orthopaedics, Kansas City Orthopaedic Alliance, Leawood, KS (Dr. Krumme).
Geriatric femoral neck fractures are common orthopaedic injuries, which are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Arthroplasty is the optimum treatment for many of these injuries, but debate exists regarding optimal surgical strategy. Multiple recent investigations have demonstrated strong superiority for cemented stems as compared with noncemented fixation with a decreased risk of periprosthetic fracture, shorter length of stay, lower cost, and decreased rate for revision surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Città della Salute e della Scienza Turin Italy.
Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) using uncemented press-fit stems (hybrid fixation) versus cemented stems (cemented fixation). It is also examined whether cemented fixation offers any superiority over hybrid fixation regarding implant survival, clinical function, imaging analysis and complication rates.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on five databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Medline and Cochrane).
Acta Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background And Purpose: Computed tomography radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) assesses implant micromovements using low-dose CT scans. We aimed to investigate whether CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measuring early femoral head migration in cemented stems. We hypothesized that CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based RSA in evaluating femoral head subsidence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Arthroplasty
February 2025
American Joint Replacement Registry, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rosemont, Illinois.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!