[Comparative assessment of helical CT-angiography, 2D TOF MR-angiography and 3D gadolinium enhanced MRA in aorto-iliac occlusive disease].

Purpose: To compare helical CT-angiography (CTA) and two techniques of MR angiography (MRA) to conventional angiography in aorto-iliac occlusive disease.

Materials And Methods: The abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in 22 patients (4 for preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm and 18 for peripheral vascular disease) were imaged using four techniques: digital subtraction angiography ("gold standard"), 2D TOF MR angiography, 3D Gd-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography. Source (CTA and 2D TOF MRA) and MIPed images (after subtraction measures before and after gadolinium injection for 3D Gd-MRA) were reviewed.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of significant (>50%) stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries were respectively: 38%, 89%, 77% for 2D TOF MRA; 75%, 71%, 72% for 3D Gd-MRA and 95%, 90%, 92% for CTA. Excluding the internal iliac arteries, results were 54%, 96%, 88% for 2D TOF MRA; 96%, 80%, 83% for 3D Gd-MRA and 92%, 93%, 95% for CTA.

Conclusion: 3D Gd-MRA, a technique with potential for further improvement, is superior to 2D TOF MRA for detecting significant stenosis and occlusion of aorto-iliac arteries. Results at Gd-MRA are nearly similar to those at CTA (after excluding internal iliac arteries). Results at Gd-MRA are not affected by calcified plaque.