Spurious estimations of sodium removal during CAPD when [Na](+) is measured by Na electrode methodology.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pH and glucose concentration on sodium removal and the dialysate and plasma sodium ratio (D/PNa) as measured by means of a flame photometer (NaF) or direct ion-selective electrode (NaE) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Methods: In vitro, glucose concentration, pH, NaF, and NaE were measured in fresh peritoneal dialysis solutions (PDSs) before and after the addition of glucose or KOH. In vivo, 66 four-hour peritoneal equilibration tests were performed in 35 patients on CAPD using a low pH PDS with a glucose concentration of 3.86%.

Results: In vitro, NaF and NaE were significantly influenced by the glucose concentration and pH of the PDS. In vivo, in fresh PDS, there was a significant difference between the NaF and NaE results; the respective median values were 132.1 (interquartile range 129.3 to 137.5) versus 138.0 (134.4 to 141.5) mmol/L (P < 0.0001). The D/PNa ratio calculated by NaE was significantly lower than that calculated by NaF (0.88 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.04 and 0. 90 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.04 at 60 and 240 min, respectively, P < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference between the NaE and NaF values after correction for plasma water and a Donnan factor of 0.96 (0.88 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.88 +/- 0.04 and 0.90 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.04, P < 0.3473). Sodium removal was significantly lower when calculated as NaE than when calculated as NaF (43.9 +/- 32.7 vs. 61.0 +/- 32.2 mmol, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The fresh PDS sodium concentration can be corrected using a glucose concentration-related factor. The D/PNa ratio calculated as NaE or NaF is not different after correction for plasma water and a Donnan factor of 0.96. Sodium removal must be measured by means of NaF rather than NaE. This could have an important clinical impact.