Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?

Patient Educ Couns

Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Catholic University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Published: January 2000

Shared decision-making is considered an important ideal for physician-patient interaction. The ideal states that health-related values should be discussed together. It raises two questions: (a) for which decisions is the ideal of shared decision-making relevant? (b) Which aspects of treatment should be discussed? The nephrological practice under consideration in this article answers question (a) as follows: decisions about the type of dialysis are shared decisions, while decisions about the moment to start dialysis are medical decisions that should be taken by nephrologists. This situation can be criticized as important health-related values play a role in decisions about starting dialysis. Question (b) is answered in the nephrological practice under consideration by discussing at least all important health-related aspects that raise uncertainty about its worth for a patient. This approach to question (b) is morally and practically defensible.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00093-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shared decision-making
8
health-related values
8
nephrological practice
8
practice consideration
8
decisions
6
decision-making nephrology
4
shared
4
nephrology shared
4
shared decision
4
decision making?
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!