Background: Intentional injury is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and has been associated with certain demographic and socioeconomic groups. Less is known about the relationship of intentional traumatic brain injury (TBI) to injury severity, mortality, and demographic and socioeconomic profile. The objective of this study was to delineate demographic and event-related factors associated with intentional TBI and to evaluate the predictive value of intentional TBI on injury severity and mortality.
Methods: Prospective data were obtained for 2,637 adults sustaining TBIs between January 1994 and September 1998. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the predictive value of intentional TBI on injury severity and mortality.
Results: Gender, minority status, age, substance abuse, and residence in a zipcode with low average income were associated with intentional TBI. Multivariate analysis found minority status and substance abuse to be predictive of intentional injury after adjusting for other demographic variables studied. Intentional TBI was predictive of mortality and anatomic severity of injury to the head. Penetrating intentional TBI was predictive of injury severity with all injury severity markers studied.
Conclusion: Many demographic variables are risk factors for intentional TBI, and such injury is a risk factor for both injury severity and mortality. Future studies are needed to definitively link intentional TBI to disability and functional outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200009000-00004 | DOI Listing |
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
December 2024
Behavioral Neurology Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Arciniegas); Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Sherer); H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Arciniegas, Sander, Bogaards, Sherer); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colo. (Almeida, Harrison-Felix, Ketchum, Mellick); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Mass. (Giacino, Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Giacino, Zafonte); Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis (Hammond); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (Hammond); Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pa. (Hart, Whyte); Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (Hart).
Cureus
October 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
J Head Trauma Rehabil
September 2024
Author Affiliations: Department of Veterans Affairs, Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Hines, Illinois (Dr Kemp); K. R. Love Quantitative Consulting and Collaboration, Athens, Georgia (Dr Love); and Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr O'Brien).
Objective: Changes in health behavior are key to maintaining health, safety, and independence of older adults. The purpose of this study was to explore factors impacting training in self-management and behavior change in older adults with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), informing efforts to improve safety and independent function.
Methods: Forty-one older adults, 19 with TBI, completed a self-regulation intervention (mental contrasting with implementation intentions; MCII) to promote fall prevention behavior change.
Neurology
October 2024
From the Department of Neurological Surgery (D.O.O.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.M.), Stamford, CT; Department of Neurosurgery (A.S.A.), Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA; Department of Neurosurgery (Y.K.), The University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery (M.K.), Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Department of Neurology (S.C.C.), University of California, Los Angeles; Westview Clinical Research (A.L.), Placentia, CA; Department of Translational Neurosciences (S.K.), Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA; The Neurology Center of Southern California (B.M.F.), Carlsbad, CA; Department of Neurology (L.I.G.), University of California, Irvine; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (A.S.K.), Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (N.E.S.), and Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Health Care, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (J.W.C.), University of California, Irvine; JCHO Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center (H.I.), Japan; Department of Neurological Surgery (T.Y.), Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan; SanBio, Inc. (D.C., B.N., D.B.), Mountain View, CA; Watson & Stonehouse Enterprises LLC (A.H.S.), Pacific Grove, CA; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (R.M.R.), Boston; Department of Neurosurgery and Stanford Stroke Center (G.K.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Health Care, CA; Biostatistical Consulting Inc. (E.C.P.), Mountain View, CA; and Neurotrauma Rehabilitation Associates LLC (A.H.W.), Littleton, CO.
Background And Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently characterized by chronic motor deficits. Therefore, this clinical trial assessed whether intracranial implantation of allogeneic modified mesenchymal stromal (SB623) cells can improve chronic motor deficits after TBI.
Methods: Post hoc analysis of the double-blind, randomized, prospective, surgical sham-controlled, phase 2, STEMTRA clinical trial (June 2016 and March 2019) with 48 weeks of follow-up was conducted.
J Neuropsychol
August 2024
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Semmelweis University Rehabilitation Clinic, Budapest, Hungary.
A large body of evidence suggests that individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have significant difficulties with prospective memory (PM), the memory for future intentions. However, the processes underlying this cognitive deficit remain unclear. This study aimed to gather further evidence regarding PM functions in TBI and clarify the role of neuropsychological deficits, metamemory, and mood disorders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!