Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The results of diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) were retrospectively analyzed in 2403 patients, in 336 of them diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) was performed. Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 132 (39.3%) patients, other surgical diseases were found in 102 (20.35%) and acute surgical abdominal diseases of were excluded in 102 (20.35%) patients. AA was also diagnosed in 17 patients suspected for other surgical diseases of the abdomen. This is DLS showed AA in 149 (42.2%) patients and its absence in 204 (57.8%) cases DLS revealed cathartic AA was in 3 (2%) patients, in of 2 of them there was a diagnostic error during morphologic control (no inflammation). The diagnostic error rate was 96% in the group of 163 patients undergone appendectomy for cathartic AA without previous DLS. At DLS destructive AA forms were diagnosed in 111 patients, diagnostic errors were made in 0.9%. In the group of patients undergone appendectomy for destructive AA without previous DLS, the diagnostic errors rate was 1.1%. In 35 cases (23.4%) when the appendix could not be visualized at DLS (including patients with appendiceal infiltrate), the diagnosis was based on indirect criteria, errors being made in 3 cases. There were neither direct nor indirect data on the appendiceal status in 3 (0.9%) DLS. In these cases, the policy was based on clinical manifestations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!