A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements by bolus tracking. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) in pigs using gadodiamide injections and bolus tracking with two imaging methods: gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE).
  • The results indicated a linear relationship between CBF and CBV measurements from both methods, suggesting that normalization techniques for SE can also apply to GE readings.
  • The comparable ratios for CBV and CBF between the two methods imply that both are effective for clinical measurements of brain function.

Article Abstract

The authors measured cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) in pigs by gadodiamide bolus injections and the bolus tracking technique. Two different pulse sequences were applied and compared: gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) echoplanar imaging (EPI). After normalization of CBF and CBV values to the area under the arterial input function (AIF), a linear relation between the two methods was found, suggesting that a previous normalization approach for determining absolute CBF by SE EPI may be extended to GE EPI measurements. The ratio between CBV values measured with GE and SE [CBV (GE)/CBV (SE)] was 2.96. Assuming that the GE acquisition reflects total CBV, our findings suggest that SE is sensitive to 34% (1/2.96) of the total vasculature. The corresponding ratio for CBF was 2.53. There was no significant difference in these two ratios, suggesting that MTT estimates derived from GE and SE EPI measurements are comparable. The findings suggest that SE and GE are equally useful in clinical measurements of functional parameters such as CBF, CBV, and MTT in the brain. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:411-416.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200009)12:3<411::aid-jmri6>3.0.co;2-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cbf cbv
12
cbv mtt
8
bolus tracking
8
cerebral blood
8
cbv values
8
epi measurements
8
cbf
6
cbv
6
comparison gradient-
4
gradient- spin-echo
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!