A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements. | LitMetric

Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements.

J Biomed Mater Res

IRC in Biomedical Materials, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.

Published: September 2000

The mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement, used in orthopedic surgery, are very influential in determining successful long-term stability of a prosthesis. A large number of commercial formulations are available, differing in chemical composition and physical properties of both powder and monomer constituents. In this study, the static and dynamic tensile characteristics of a number of the most commonly used bone cements (Palacos R, Simplex P, CMW 1 & 3, Sulfix-60, Zimmer Dough), along with some newer formulations (Endurance, Duracem 3, Osteobondtrade mark and Boneloc), have been investigated under the same testing regimes. Testing was performed in air at room temperature. Significant differences in both static and fatigue properties were found between the various bone cements. Tensile tests revealed that Palacos R, Sulfix-60, and Simplex P had the highest values of ultimate tensile strength, closely followed by CMW 3, while Zimmer Dough cement had the lowest strength. Fatigue testing was performed under stress control, using sinusoidal loading in tension-tension, with an upper stress level of 22MPa. The two outstanding cements when tested in these cyclic conditions were Simplex P and Palacos R, with the highest values of Weibull median cycles to failure. Boneloc bone cement demonstrated the lowest cycles to failure. While the testing regimes were not designed to replicate exact conditions experienced by the bone cement mantle in vivo, there was a correlation between these results and clinical outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200009)53:5<605::aid-jbm22>3.0.co;2-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone cements
12
bone cement
12
tensile characteristics
8
acrylic bone
8
zimmer dough
8
testing regimes
8
testing performed
8
highest values
8
cycles failure
8
bone
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!