Immediate and long-term results comparing coronary versus biliary tubular-slotted stents to treat old obstructed saphenous vein grafts.

Stenting of old obstructed saphenous vein grafts improves immediate angiographic results and long-term clinical outcome compared to standard balloon angioplasty. Comparison of results and long-term clinical outcome between different types of stents in the treatment of vein graft disease is scarce. The authors studied two matched groups of 33 patients each, receiving either coronary or biliary tubular-slotted stents in old vein graft lesions to compare immediate results and long-term clinical outcome. Patients in the two groups were matched for age and left ventricular function. Baseline angiographic characteristics, the minimal luminal diameter (MLD) (0.68 +/- 0.56 mm vs 0.61 +/- 0.51 mm, p = 0.9), and diameter stenosis (DS) (81 +/- 14% vs 82 +/- 15%) were similar between the groups. After stenting, the MLD (3.15 +/- 0.65 mm vs 3.37 +/- 0.63 mm, p = 0.9) and residual stenosis (-7 +/- 19% vs -11 +/- 21%) were also similar. The in-hospital major complications (myocardial infarction and death) (one vs eight, p = 0.01) and the combination of major and minor (bleeding and vascular) complications (eight vs 17, p = 0.02) were higher in the biliary stent group. At long-term follow-up, both groups of patients had high but comparable rates of major cardiovascular events (39% vs 45%, p = 0.62). Kaplan-Meier event-free survival analysis did not show any statistically significant difference in event-free survival (log-rank statistic 0.98). The authors conclude that patients receiving biliary stents had higher rates of immediate minor and major complications, but at long-term follow up, major cardiovascular event rates were comparable between the two groups of patients.