Comparison of five methods for the detection of measles specific immunoglobulin G antibody.

Rev Latinoam Microbiol

Unidad de Investigacion Médica en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Parasitarias, Hospital de Pediatria del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México D. F.

Published: September 2000

In this work we compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hemagglutination inhibition (HI), immunofluorescent assay (IFA), biotin-streptavidin immunofluorescent assay (B/SA-IFA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) and plaque neutralization test (PN). This study includes serum samples from children taken before and after vaccination, children with clinically diagnosed measles and household contacts. EIA were the most specific and better serological diagnostic test. HI and IFA had high sensitivity but low specificity. An alternative to EIA is B/SAIFA, which is cheaper than EIA and can be used in the study of small outbreaks or in isolated cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immunofluorescent assay
8
comparison methods
4
methods detection
4
detection measles
4
measles specific
4
specific immunoglobulin
4
immunoglobulin antibody
4
antibody work
4
work compare
4
compare sensitivity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!