End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are known to suffer from chronic inflammation as the result of an ongoing subacute cytokine induction, which may contribute considerably to dialysis-related, long-term morbidity and mortality. Preparation of infusate from cytokine-inducing dialysis fluid and its administration in large quantities as well as the use of high-flux membranes bear the risk of aggravating the chronic inflammatory response among online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) patients. In order to assess the inflammatory risk associated with online HDF, we compared the cytokine induction profile of ESRD patients receiving either online HDF or low-flux hemodialysis (low-flux HD). Specifically, we measured spontaneous and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) release during ex vivo incubation of whole blood. Ultrapure dialysis fluid and polysulfone membranes were used for both treatment modalities. LPS-stimulated release of TNFalpha and IL-1Ra was elevated for both online HDF and low-flux HD patients compared to healthy individuals (TNFalpha: 2,336 +/- 346 and 2,192 +/- 398 versus 1,218 +/- 224 pg/106 white blood cells [WBC]; IL-1Ra: 2,410 +/- 284 and 2,326 +/- 186 versus 1,678 +/- 219 pg/106 WBC). Likewise, spontaneous production of TNFalpha, but not IL-1Ra, was higher in online HDF and low-flux HD patients than in normal controls (37 +/- 32 and 22 +/- 19 versus 0.8 +/- 0.3 pg TNFalpha/106 WBC). There was no difference in spontaneous and LPS-stimulated cytokine release between both dialysis groups. In addition, intradialytic cytokine induction was not significant for either treatment modality as spontaneous and LPS-stimulated cytokine release were not increased postdialysis. These findings indicate that online HDF does not contribute to chronic leukocyte activation and, consequently, does not place ESRD patients at greater risk with respect to inflammatory morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06515.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online hdf
24
cytokine induction
16
esrd patients
12
hdf low-flux
12
+/-
9
online
8
online hemodiafiltration
8
morbidity mortality
8
dialysis fluid
8
tnfalpha il-1ra
8

Similar Publications

: High-volume online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has proven to be the most efficient dialysis modality and to offer better clinical outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. Longer and more frequent dialysis sessions have demonstrated clinical and survival benefits. : A single-center observational study of the first one hundred patients on nocturnal every-other-day OL-HDF was conducted with the aim of reporting the experience with this treatment schedule and evaluating analytical and clinical outcomes as well as the patient and technique survival.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Various high-efficiency hemodialysis techniques exist, including different online high- volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) modes and expanded hemodialysis (HDx) utilizing dialyzers with medium cut-off (MCO) membranes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of uremic toxin removal among four modalities: (I) HDx, (II) pre-dilution HDF (PRE-HDF), (III) mixed-dilution HDF (MIX-HDF), and (IV) post-dilution HDF (POST-HDF), each applied for 1 week in a randomized order. This research was a single-center, prospective, open-label, exploratory crossover study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis for kidney failure: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Lancet

October 2024

Department of Nephrology & Hypertension and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Background: High-dose haemodiafiltration has been shown, in a randomised clinical trial, to result in a 23% lower risk of mortality for patients with kidney failure when compared with conventional high-flux haemodialysis. Nevertheless, whether treatment effects differ across subgroups, whether a dose-response relationship with convection volume exists, and the effects on cause-specific mortality remain unclear. The aim of this individual patient data meta-analysis was to compare the effects of haemodiafiltration and standard haemodialysis on all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: The cost resulting from peritoneal dialysis (PD), conventional hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) in pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has not been estimated to date in Greece. The present single-center retrospective study aimed to estimate the mean annual cost of the above methods, as well as the individual components of this cost.

Methods: Twenty pediatric patients undergoing the three different methods of renal replacement therapy were included in this study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Hyperkalemia is a health problem linked to heart issues in patients receiving dialysis, and this study looks at how different dialysis methods affect potassium removal.
  • The study involved 141 patients, with most receiving online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), and it found that the method didn't significantly change how much potassium was removed during treatment.
  • The main factors affecting potassium removal were the levels of potassium in the dialysis solution and the length of the dialysis session, not the type of dialysis used.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!