Standards for the management of cervical and vulval carcinoma.

Objective: To examine the feasibility of achieving designated target standards for the management of women with cervical and vulval cancer.

Design: Retrospective casenote review.

Setting: The Gynaecological Oncology Centre at Hammersmith Hospital, London.

Population: Sixty-one women with cervical and vulval cancer presenting to the gynaecological oncology clinic at the Hammersmith Hospital during 1996 and 1997. Various aspects of the management of those women were compared with standards suggested by a multidisciplinary panel of local experts. Targets included the referral and treatment process, the accuracy of staging, and measures of surgical performance.

Result: The target interval of seven days between receipt of the referral and the first visit at the cancer centre was achieved in 93% of women. Surgical treatment was administered to 92% of the women within the target of 20 working days from the first clinic appointment. Tumour close to or involving the margins of the specimen was noted in 13% of cervical and 9% of vulval cancers. The node count fell below the target standards in 13% of pelvic and 10% of groin dissections. Appropriate imaging investigations for staging were not undertaken in 15 of 39 cases (38%) of cervical cancer and in 5 out of 22 (23%) of vulval cancers.

Conclusion: The suggested targets of process and surgical performance are reasonable and achievable. These standards would be appropriate for national use. The area most clearly identified where these targets were not achieved was the requesting of complementary staging investigations. This could be addressed by the use of a simple investigation protocol to be included in each patient's notes and available at specialist clinics and gynaecology wards.