Clinical significance of P-glycoprotein expression and function for response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate and overall survival in acute leukemia.

Background And Objectives: A multidrug-resistance (MDR) phenotype mediated by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) contributes to chemotherapy failure in acute leukemia. However, the exact prognostic significance of this resistance mechanism is still unclear, mostly due to methodologic problems in P-gp detection. We therefore investigated, whether P-gp expression levels or functional P-gp activity better predict response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate and overall survival in acute leukemia.

Design And Methods: We examined cell samples of 121 adults with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 102 children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for P-gp expression and functional P-gp activity by flow cytometry. P-gp function was determined by the rhodamine 123 (rh123)-efflux test (AML n=121, ALL n=102) and P-gp expression levels using the P-gp specific monoclonal antibodies (moabs) MRK-16 (AML n=51, ALL n=31), 4.E3 (AML n=35, ALL n=32), or UIC-2 (AML n=68, ALL n=50). We correlated our findings with the immunophenotype, FAB morphology, cytogenetics and clinical data of the examined patients.

Results: P-gp expression levels as detected by MRK-16 and 4.E3 were very low and did not differ between AML and ALL as estimated using relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) values and D-values by Kolmogorow-Smirnov (KS) statistics. For moab UIC-2, P-gp expression levels were higher in AML than in ALL. Within AML, moab UIC-2 mainly reacted with myelomonocytic-differentiated leukemic cells of the FAB M4/5 subtypes. No correlation between P-gp expression levels as detected by MRK-16, 4.E3 or UIC-2 and the response to induction chemotherapy or relapse rate, both in AML and ALL, was observed. However, a prognostic impact of P-gp expression levels on overall survival in AML was seen for moab MRK-16. Moreover, within AML, P-gp function was higher in immature blast cells as defined by immunophenotype and FAB morphology and correlated with response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate, overall survival as well as cytogenetic risk groups. In ALL, the overall functional P-gp activity was lower than in AML and did not correlate with immunophenotypical subgroups, response to induction chemotherapy, relapse rate or overall survival.

Interpretation And Conclusions: Our data demonstrate a prognostic impact of P-gp in AML but not ALL and indicate that the functional rh123-efflux assay should be preferred for flow-cytometric P-gp evaluation in acute leukemia compared with P-gp expression analysis by monoclonal antibodies.