A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success. | LitMetric

Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success.

Ophthalmology

Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park.

Published: June 2000

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to analyze the long-term impacts of penetrating keratoplasty on vision in patients with keratoconus.
  • The procedure was performed on 93 eyes of 78 patients, showing high graft survival (98.92%) and significant improvement in visual acuity over a mean follow-up of 46 months.
  • Results indicated that 86% of eyes achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better post-surgery, while no preoperative factors were found to significantly predict postgraft astigmatism.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the long-term effect on vision of penetrating keratoplasty performed for keratoconus.

Design: Retrospective noncomparative case series.

Participants: All patients with keratoconus who received a corneal graft and who remained in our center for follow-up and visual rehabilitation during the study period.

Intervention: Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 93 eyes of 78 patients.

Main Outcome Measures: Graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism.

Results: One (1.08%) graft failure was encountered over a mean follow-up of 46 months. Mean preoperative (best corrected) and postoperative visual acuity is (best-tolerated correction) were 0.9 (20/160) and 0.24 (20/80) logMAR, respectively. Visual acuity in 86% of eyes was 0.3 logMAR (20/40) or better at the latest follow-up, with 67% of eyes being corrected with spectacles. Mean preoperative corneal power by keratometry was more than 52 diopters (D) in 83% of eyes; mean postoperative corneal power was 45 +/- 2 D. No significant predictors of postgraft astigmatism were found. Mean preoperative and postoperative best-eye acuities of the better eye were 0.32 (20/40-1) and 0.18 (20/32+1) logMAR, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Graft survival was excellent. A corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was obtained in 86% of eyes. Astigmatism could not be predicted from preoperative factors. Visual acuity measured in the better eye improved by 0.14 logMAR (1.4 lines), implying an overall functional gain for the patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00112-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual acuity
20
penetrating keratoplasty
12
keratoplasty performed
8
graft survival
8
86% eyes
8
20/40 better
8
corneal power
8
better eye
8
visual
7
eyes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!