We examined whether the harmful influence of nulliparity on breast cancer risk could be mediated by high mammographic density. Another possibility is that mammographic density and nulliparity act independently or perhaps synergistically on breast cancer risk. Our study population consisted of 129 cases and 517 controls who had been participants in the Nijmegen breast cancer screening programme for 10 years. Breast density was classified with a fully automated technique on digitized mammograms from the screening examination 10 years before diagnosis. Classification was based on the proportion of the breast that was composed of high density: < 5%, 5-25% or > 25%. Data on parity and potential confounders were obtained using a questionnaire, administered at the same examination. We found that nulliparae with low breast density (< 5%) were not at increased risk compared to parous women with low density: OR 1.1 (95% CI 0.2-5.8). Parous women with < 5% density formed the reference category throughout all analyses. The risks for parous women with 5-25% or > 25% density were 2.7 (95% CI 1.3-5.6) and 3.6 (95% CI 1.7-7.7) fold increased, respectively. However, when both factors were present (nulliparity and > or = 5% density), breast cancer risk was 7.1 times higher (95% CI 3.2-15.9). This could indicate that nulliparity and high breast density might work synergistically and that breast density is not just an explanatory factor in the influence of nulliparity on breast cancer risk. It is hypothesized that high breast density (reflecting fibro-glandular tissue with increased epithelial cell proliferation) is more susceptible to carcinogenic effects in the undifferentiated epithelial breast tissue of nulliparae than in the differentiated tissue of parous women. Since there were few data, no firm conclusions can be drawn. If these findings can be confirmed in a larger study population, however, they may have important implications for the prevention and early detection of breast cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200004000-00006 | DOI Listing |
Womens Health (Lond)
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Glendale Campus, Glendale, AZ, USA.
In 2023, a breast cancer risk assessment and a subsequent positive test for the BRCA-2 genetic mutation brought me to the uncomfortable intersection of a longstanding career as an advocate for high-quality medical evidence to support shared patient-provider decision making and a new role as a high-risk patient. My search for studies of available risk-management options revealed that the most commonly recommended approach for women with a ⩾20% lifetime breast cancer risk, intensive screening including annual mammography and/or magnetic resonance imaging beginning at age 25-40 years, was supported only by cancer-detection statistics, with almost no evidence on patient-centered outcomes-mortality, physical and psychological morbidity, or quality of life-compared with standard screening or a surgical alternative, bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy. In this commentary, I explore parallels between the use of the intensive screening protocol and another longstanding women's health recommendation based on limited evidence, the use of hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal chronic disease prevention, which was sharply curtailed after the publication of the groundbreaking Women's Health Initiative trial in 2002.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychooncology
January 2025
The Department of Breast Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Objective: Breast cancer patients often face a significant financial burden, leading to financial toxicity due to the necessity for long-term care, costly treatment, and follow-up measures. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available qualitative evidence on how breast cancer patients cope with financial toxicity and their unmet need to promote the implementation of effective intervention strategies.
Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, and VIP databases were systematically searched for literature related to the study topic.
IUBMB Life
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tamoxifen (TAM) is employed to treat premenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients, but TAM resistance is the main reason affecting its efficacy. Thus, addressing TAM resistance is crucial for improving therapeutic outcomes. This study explored the potential role of Tinagl1, a secreted extracellular matrix protein, whose expression is compromised in TAM-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells (MCF-7R).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Med Chem
January 2025
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Background: Breast cancer is a frequently diagnosed malignant disease and the primary cause of mortality among women with cancer worldwide. The therapy options are influenced by the molecular subtype due to the intricate nature of the condition, which consists of various subtypes. By focusing on the activation of receptors, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase can be utilized as an effective drug target for therapeutic purposes of breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Rep
February 2025
Department of Anaesthesia, Surgical Critical Care and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute-Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Introduction: Management of pain associated with breast cancer surgeries is crucial in reducing incidence of postmastectomy pain syndrome. The pain distribution involves the anterior chest wall, axillary area and ipsilateral upper limb.
Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effect of bilevel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with high thoracic block vs the conventional unilevel ESPB vs opioids in patients with cancer undergoing modified radical mastectomy regarding pain control and reducing pain in axilla.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!