Family-aided assertive community treatment (FACT) was enhanced by adding vocational specialists to help persons with severe mental illness obtain competitive employment. Results were then tested against those of conventional vocational rehabilitation (CVR). The FACT cohort demonstrated significantly better employment rates than did the CVR, while negative symptoms declined in the former and increased in the latter. No evidence was found that competitive work presented a significant risk for relapse.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087819 | DOI Listing |
Schizophr Bull
January 2015
Washtenaw Community Health Organization, Ypsilanti, MI;
Objective: To test effectiveness of the Early Detection, Intervention, and Prevention of Psychosis Program in preventing the onset of severe psychosis and improving functioning in a national sample of at-risk youth.
Methods: In a risk-based allocation study design, 337 youth (age 12-25) at risk of psychosis were assigned to treatment groups based on severity of positive symptoms. Those at clinically higher risk (CHR) or having an early first episode of psychosis (EFEP) were assigned to receive Family-aided Assertive Community Treatment (FACT); those at clinically lower risk (CLR) were assigned to receive community care.
Am J Orthopsychiatry
April 2000
Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA.
Family-aided assertive community treatment (FACT) was enhanced by adding vocational specialists to help persons with severe mental illness obtain competitive employment. Results were then tested against those of conventional vocational rehabilitation (CVR). The FACT cohort demonstrated significantly better employment rates than did the CVR, while negative symptoms declined in the former and increased in the latter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatr Serv
July 1996
Maine Medical Center, Portland 04102, USA.
Objective: The study examined differences in outcomes for patients with schizophrenic disorders who were receiving assertive community treatment based on whether their families were involved in their treatment more intensively in psychoeducational multifamily groups or episodically in crisis family intervention.
Methods: Sixty-eight individuals who met DSM-III-R criteria for schizophrenic disorders and who had at least one other major complicating factor were randomly assigned to the two treatment conditions, and clinical and functional outcomes over a 24-month follow-up period were compared.
Results: Both groups had significant reductions in rehospitalization rates and symptom levels and increased participation in treatment.
New Dir Ment Health Serv
June 1992
Biosocial Treatment Research Division, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!