Why (1S)-Camphanates Are Excellent Resolving Agents for Helicen-1-ols and Why They Can Be Used to Analyze Absolute Configurations.

J Org Chem

Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716.

Published: March 2000

The questions considered in this paper are why, as agents for resolving helicenols, camphanate esters are particularly effective, and why, in all 19 examples studied, when the (1S)-camphanates of (P)- and (M)-helicen-1-ols are chromatographed on silica gel, the former has the lower R(f)(). Models are proposed for the favored conformations of the esters, and to support the models, evidence is provided from five X-ray diffraction analyses and four ROESY analyses supplemented by molecular mechanics calculations. The essential discovery is that, presumably to avoid a steric interaction between a methyl on the camphanate's bridge and the helicene skeleton, the O=CCO conformation is anti-periplanar in (M)-helicenol camphanates and syn-periplanar in (P)-helicenol camphanates. In the former, the lactone carbonyl points toward the helicene ring system, and in the latter, it points away.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo9919411DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

1s-camphanates excellent
4
excellent resolving
4
resolving agents
4
agents helicen-1-ols
4
helicen-1-ols analyze
4
analyze absolute
4
absolute configurations
4
configurations questions
4
questions considered
4
considered paper
4

Similar Publications

Why (1S)-Camphanates Are Excellent Resolving Agents for Helicen-1-ols and Why They Can Be Used to Analyze Absolute Configurations.

J Org Chem

March 2000

Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716.

The questions considered in this paper are why, as agents for resolving helicenols, camphanate esters are particularly effective, and why, in all 19 examples studied, when the (1S)-camphanates of (P)- and (M)-helicen-1-ols are chromatographed on silica gel, the former has the lower R(f)(). Models are proposed for the favored conformations of the esters, and to support the models, evidence is provided from five X-ray diffraction analyses and four ROESY analyses supplemented by molecular mechanics calculations. The essential discovery is that, presumably to avoid a steric interaction between a methyl on the camphanate's bridge and the helicene skeleton, the O=CCO conformation is anti-periplanar in (M)-helicenol camphanates and syn-periplanar in (P)-helicenol camphanates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!