Introduction: Traditionally, heart bypass surgery has required stopping of the heart and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Numerous complications have been associated with exposure to this extracorporeal circuit. Newer techniques of local cardiac wall stabilization now enable this operation to be performed safely "Off Pump". The early clinical results of Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OPCAB) will be compared to a similar group of traditional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) patients.
Methods: A retrospective review of 137 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting was performed, 68 of who underwent traditional CABG and 69 of who underwent OPCAB. Inclusion criteria consisted of first time cardiac surgical procedures with an ejection fraction > or = 20%, without significant renal failure (creatinine < 2.0).
Results: There was no statistical difference in the age, sex, cardiac function or underlying co-morbidities between those undergoing CABG and OPCAB. CABG patients had slightly more vessels bypassed than those in the OPCAB group (3.0 vs 2.6, p = 0.010). Despite similar preoperative characteristics, the OPCAB group experienced a reduction in morbidity without an increase in mortality.
Conclusion: In similar patient populations, OPCAB was associated with significantly reduced transfusion requirements, intubation time, ICU and overall hospital lengths of stay, with no increase in mortality. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain the role of the OPCAB in the general cardiac surgical community.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!